Help support TMP


"Nightmare opponents" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Historical Wargaming in General Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

The QuarterMaster Table Top

Need 16 square feet of gaming space, built to order?


Featured Workbench Article

Around the World in 80 Days

Everyone has a pile of shame - miniatures that you were all hot to get, had big plans for, and then never did anything with...


Featured Profile Article

Crafter's Square Brush Cleaning Pot

Interested in an inexpensive pot for cleaning your brushes?


Current Poll


137 hits since 25 Apr 2026
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP25 Apr 2026 4:06 a.m. PST

Which historical general would be the worst wargame opponent?

Not the best commander in history (who would invariably beat you into a cocked hat every game) but the worst person to actually sit across the table from on a gaming night.

Who would be unbearable? Endless arguing over line of sight? Refusing to accept the scenario brief because "my cavalry should be on the left"? Taking three hours to deploy because staff work must be exact? Demanding hidden movement for everything? Frothing at the mouth if things go pear-shaped & throwing his dice across the room?

Napoleon might insist every defeat was really the umpire's fault. Wellington would probably spend the whole evening complaining about the terrain. Montgomery might rewrite the scenario before Turn 1. Patton would move before you'd finished placing your figures.

Who would be the absolute nightmare opponent and why?

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP25 Apr 2026 5:18 a.m. PST

Alexander the Great would be insufferably arrogant

Fredrick the Great would turn up in a ratty old coat, spend the whole game snorting snuff and making caustic remarks

Genghis Khan would show up in a coat covered in grease, beat your butt on the gaming table and then wander over to a corner of the room to have a pee

George McClellan would spend so much time arranging and re-arranging his troops the game would never start

rustymusket Supporting Member of TMP25 Apr 2026 6:47 a.m. PST

Grant would be quiet and unassuming. For pete's sake, show something!

Gear Pilot Too25 Apr 2026 6:47 a.m. PST

Hitler would throw a temper tantrum at every setback, pounding the table and shouting "Nein! Nein! Nein! Then pull extra units that aren't in the scenario out of his transport bag and deploy them in your flank.

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP25 Apr 2026 8:18 a.m. PST

His Imperial Majesty Napoleon I. In addition to blaming the umpire, I'd expect loaded dice, and cheating at card draws. In his later years, he'd point-blank refuse to accept troop numbers and morale/training states for his own forces, and insist that enemy units which had fallen back had actually routed.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP25 Apr 2026 8:31 a.m. PST

De Gaulle would claim that his one tank won the battle, along with a handful of civilian figures.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP25 Apr 2026 8:37 a.m. PST

Charles Lee would whine and complain that HE should command that wing. Then he would panic and abandon the troops. After the game, in the Trash Talk Phase*, he would demand that everyone acknowledge his brilliant plan.

*We call it something more vulgar.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP25 Apr 2026 8:38 a.m. PST

Blucher would arrive late for the game, and mutter "I see you started without me."

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.