
"Who Keeps a Reserve?" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article I paint the last two figures from the Escape from the Dark Czar starter set.
Featured Workbench Article Containers for when you need to sideline that project you've been working on, or maybe just not lose the bits you're not ready for yet.
Featured Profile Article For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.
|
ochoin  | 25 Apr 2026 3:55 a.m. PST |
Historically, Napoleonic battles often depended on reserves—fresh troops held back to plug gaps, exploit success or deliver the decisive blow. Very often, these were the best troops: Guard formations, grenadiers, reliable veteran battalions. On the tabletop, though, good game sense is often the reverse. Your best troops are usually committed early, because you want their combat power where it matters most, while second-rate units are left in the back line holding ground and staying out of trouble. The "reserve" becomes less a decisive force and more somewhere to park weaker troops. Do our games actually reward keeping a true reserve or do rules and table size push us toward committing quality troops as soon as possible? Should elite troops be held back historically or is early use simply better game tactics? How do your rules handle reserves, and do you genuinely keep one? |
rustymusket  | 25 Apr 2026 4:04 a.m. PST |
I always desire a reserve and plan for one, but in games I have played time limits the ability to need a reserve. It is time to pack up and decide who might have won before it is time to send in the Guard. |
| PzGeneral | 25 Apr 2026 4:24 a.m. PST |
My troops go 'All In'. Death or Glory! Dave |
14Bore  | 25 Apr 2026 4:50 a.m. PST |
Its size of table that may permit a reserve, or troops appear on turn x. But seems in games everythrows in everyy figure asap. |
| Valmy92 | 25 Apr 2026 5:03 a.m. PST |
Rusty Musket hits the issue on the head. Time. Another factor is whether fighting units get worn down. If I fight all of your army with 2/3 of mine they get smacked and the remaining 1/3 can't do much to save the day of your whole army still fights like it's mostly fresh. That's for battlefield level reserve formations. Local reserves (a few units in the second line to counter breakthroughs or provide a rear support bonus are a different question. |
Frederick  | 25 Apr 2026 5:22 a.m. PST |
For some of our games we delay unit entry which I guess would count as a reserve As to committing troops, at least for SYW there is a bit of a risk putting in second rate troops first 'cause if they break and flee and the line of battle is compromised it can be pretty tough to fix that – not the case I would say necessarily for Napoleonics or ACW |
John the OFM  | 25 Apr 2026 8:42 a.m. PST |
When I play the Zulus in Sword and the Flame, I always start with all my troops in line. Then, when the vagaries of the dice movement sorts them out, the slower moving troops become my reserve. Believe it or not, it works. |
|