Help support TMP


"Resaca - an inverted Gettysburg" Topic


1 Post

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board

Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board

Back to the ACW Battle Reports Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Top-Rated Ruleset

Volley & Bayonet


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


93 hits since 14 Apr 2026
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

ChrisBBB2 Supporting Member of TMP14 Apr 2026 2:27 p.m. PST

Resaca is a big ACW battle that doesn't seem to get much attention from wargamers. Why is that?

- Not quite bloody enough? It can't just be that – smaller battles with smaller casualty lists get plenty of play.

- Perceived as just a dull frontal assault against earthworks? Seems unfair. After all, the Confederate defenders conducted attacks of their own with Hood's corps on both days.

- Changed nothing? That's probably it. But could it have?

I explored it by writing a scenario for it that we fought this week. It was only after the event that I realised it is very much like an inverted Gettysburg, with the Confederates playing the part of the defender. For Cemetery Hill, read the Four-Gun Battery; for the Round Tops, read the hills just west of Resaca; for East Field, read Lay's Ferry; etc, etc.

It produced a surprisingly good game in which all four players got to manoeuvre and conduct assaults. And it wasn't too far off the history, either. If you're interested in seeing a photo-AAR, look here:
link

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.