Help support TMP


"Just heard on FOX - 1000s of Iraqi Kurds attacked Iran" Topic


15 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of Kung Fu


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Amazon's Santa with Gun Pack

You wanted more photos of the Santa Claws Gang? Here is Santa and two of his companions.


Featured Profile Article

The Gates of Old Jerusalem

The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.


Featured Book Review


542 hits since 4 Mar 2026
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP04 Mar 2026 1:23 p.m. PST

Literally just heard that as I am typing this. Hope the Kurds are kicking Bleeped text and not taking names. The militant islamists body count should be major.☠

Of course, Iran is a huge country …

Awaiting more intel to come …

Are these some of the boots on the ground ? Is SF, CIA, Mossad, etc. in those ranks ? We may never know …

Good hunting boys !!!! Stack'm up like 2x4s in a lumberyard.

Don't forget the Iraqi Shia … Don't let them feel left out …

This is a target rich environment …

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP04 Mar 2026 2:12 p.m. PST

The only POSSIBLE fly in the ointment here is Turkey.
Turkey has a large Kurdish community. And the Turks have never been happy with the idea of a Kurdish state.
However, if the Turks say "Go carve out a state in Iran, and may ***** bless your undertakings. Now, go away."
I've always liked the Kurds. Honestly, I don't know why. 🤷

Who knows? Kurds were not on my Bingo card.

35thOVI Supporting Member of TMP04 Mar 2026 3:17 p.m. PST

Yes just seeing this, although we have talked about this today. I'll probably continue on the other thread. Too many threads. 😉

Personal logo aegiscg47 Supporting Member of TMP04 Mar 2026 6:41 p.m. PST

Between the Peshmerga, the YPG, and a ton of other assorted units, they have somewhere between 200-450,000 fighters, which is a lot. However, they are spread over multiple countries and are fairly decentralized. It will be interesting in the coming days to see what the actual size of the force is.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP04 Mar 2026 7:48 p.m. PST

Yes more intel is needed … We have to hear how the situation develops. Regardless I see this as a + … Anything that makes the IRGC's, Basji's, etc. life more difficult. Forcing them to disperse and spread out. To plug all the leaks, etc.

TimePortal04 Mar 2026 9:58 p.m. PST

I would suspect that attacks may be focused on traditional Kurd homeland. Going beyond that would taking ground that would have to be given back in a peace treaty.
I wonder if fighters from Kurd tribes in Iraq and Turkey are join gong it

Personal logo Old Contemptible Supporting Member of TMP04 Mar 2026 11:47 p.m. PST

Fox is reporting that — but right now it's not independently confirmed at the "thousands are invading" level.

Here's what the reporting actually looks like as of Thu, Mar 5, 2026:

Fox News claim: In its live updates, Fox says a U.S. official told them "thousands of Kurds have crossed from Iraq and launched a ground offensive in Iran," and adds that many are Iranian Kurds who had been living in Iraq and are now moving into northwestern Iran.

Important: In the same Fox item, an Iraqi Kurdish official is quoted saying "not a single Iraqi Kurd has crossed the border."
That's a big clue that "Kurds" here likely means Iranian Kurdish militias based in Iraq, not the Iraqi Kurdish regional forces (Peshmerga/KRG) as an institution.

AP (major wire) reporting today: Iranian Kurdish dissident groups say they're on standby / preparing, with movement toward the border, but AP also reports statements indicating they had not yet sent forces from Iraq into Iran (at least at the time of AP's reporting), and quotes another group saying they could be ready to cross in a week to 10 days.

Reuters (major wire): Reuters describes planning/consultations about whether and how to attack Iranian security forces, and says a final decision/timing had not been made at the time of that report. Reuters also notes it couldn't independently confirm key aspects (e.g., extent of CIA involvement).

Regional/local sources: Some outlets in Iraq's Kurdistan region report denials that any Kurdish force has crossed into Iran.

Bottom line: Fox's "thousands crossing" report is currently best treated as a single-network claim sourced to unnamed U.S. / background officials, with significant dispute/denial and limited independent verification so far. It may still turn out that some Iranian Kurdish fighters crossed in small numbers (raids/infiltration), but "thousands invading" is not yet a broadly confirmed fact across the big, independent wires.

Griefbringer05 Mar 2026 1:29 a.m. PST

On the other hand, Iranian military claims to have targeted Iranian Kurdish forces located in northern Iraq.

BBC journalist has visited the sites of two such attacks in Iraq, and reports of one dead and several injured:

link

I doubt that this kind of attacks will demoralise the Kurds.

35thOVI Supporting Member of TMP05 Mar 2026 9:20 a.m. PST

"As of March 5, 2026, thousands of Kurdish fighters have reportedly launched a ground offensive into western Iran from their bases in Iraq's Kurdistan region. This escalation follows reports that the U.S. and Israel are considering supporting these groups to destabilize the Iranian regime during the ongoing regional conflict.
The Guardian
The Guardian

Key Developments
Ground Incursion: Reports indicate that thousands of fighters, primarily from the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iran (KDPI) and Kurdistan Free Life Party (PJAK), crossed the border on March 4 and 5.

Iranian Response: Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claims to have "crushed" these units using drone and missile strikes."

But maybe they are really "Wheys". 😏

Andrew Walters05 Mar 2026 9:56 a.m. PST

This is tricky.

The Kurds could be just rescuing/protecting Kurdish people in Western Iran, or they could be trying to take territory in the chaos. Even if it's the former Turkey and Syria are going to think it's the latter. People who are oppressing their Kurdish population really don't want a Kurdish state, and the Kurds are a capable people who have been trying to establish their own state for some time.

Short version, the US has to either bribe the Kurds to behave themselves or bribe Turkey to allow the Kurds to act freely. (If you bribe the Turns Syria and Iraq are going to want bribes, too.) Otherwise you lose the united front vs Iran.

It might be good for the Kurds to get a state, but there is too much going on already, with Ecuador, Venezuela, Iran, etc. North Korea likes to act up when the US Military is heavily committed, so keep an eye on them, too.

Exciting times from a president who promised to keep us out of foreign wars.

Shardik05 Mar 2026 10:10 a.m. PST

Best of luck to the Kurds.

35thOVI Supporting Member of TMP05 Mar 2026 11:33 a.m. PST

Yes right now these are nebulous reports. Multiple sources, including AI verifying and others not.

Personal logo StoneMtnMinis Supporting Member of TMP05 Mar 2026 12:48 p.m. PST

AP and Reuters should both be taken with a large helping of salt due to their documented bias in how they report items.

kevin smoot05 Mar 2026 1:06 p.m. PST

Well it's been over a decade since we last f@#$ed the Kurds over. I guess we're due

35thOVI Supporting Member of TMP05 Mar 2026 1:23 p.m. PST

Some in another post were complaining about a lack of knowledge of history.

Well if "we let the Kurds down", we are just another in a long line of guilty countries.

"fool me once, shame on you; Fool me twice, shame on me"

"Throughout history, the plight of the Kurdish people—often described as the largest ethnic group without a state of their own—has been primarily shaped by the policies of the four nations where their ancestral lands are located, as well as by colonial powers that redrew the region's borders after World War I.
r a long history of suالمركز الكردي للدراسات
المركز الكردي للدراسات
+1

Primary Regional Actors

The four modern nation-states that currently encompass most Kurdish territory have historically engaged in varying degrees of political and ethnic persecution:
The Washington Institute
The Washington Institute
+1

Turkey: Responsible f
oppression, including the Dersim massacre (1937–38), where an official report noted over 13,000 deaths. Turkish policy for decades included the "Turkification" of Kurdish regions, which involved banning the Kurdish language, dress, and names, and labeling Kurds as "Mountain Turks" to deny their distinct identity.

Iraq: Under the Ba'athist regime of Saddam Hussein, Kurds faced genocidal campaigns. The Anfal campaign (late 1980s) resulted in 50,000 to 182,000 deaths, including the infamous chemical weapons attack on Halabja that killed 5,000 people in a single day.

Iran: Has a history of marginalizing its Kurdish population and suppressing autonomy movements. The Iranian government used military force to crush a Kurdish rebellion in 1979 and has periodically carried out executions of Kurdish political activists.

Syria: Long engaged in the "Arabisation" of its northern regions, stripping many Kurds of citizenship and banning their language and cultural expressions.
Middle East Research and Information Project
Middle East Research and Information Project
+6

Colonial and International Powers

Key international players have b
een identified as responsible for the lack of a Kurdish state and for tactical betrayals during conflicts:

Great Britain & France: Following World War I, these powers drafted the Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916), which carved the region into spheres of influence without regard for ethnic boundaries. While they initially proposed a Kurdish state in the Treaty of Sèvres (1920), they ultimately abandoned this in the Treaty of Lausanne (1923) to secure peace with the new Republic of Turkey.

United States: Frequently criticized for a cycle of support and abandonment. Notable instances include withdrawing support in 1975 after the Algiers Accord between Iraq and Iran, and the 2019 withdrawal of troops from northern Syria, which left Kurdish allies vulnerable to Turkish military incursions.
search (ECPR)
European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR)

Soviet Union: Provided intermittent support for Kurdish movements to further its own regional interests, only to withdraw aid when geopolitical priorities shifted, such as the dissolution of the short-lived Republic of Mahabad in 1946.
Middle East Research and Information Project
Middle East Research and Information Project
+7

Other Noted Historical Actors

The Ottoman and Safavid Empires: In earlier centuries, these empires used the Kurdish regions as a buffer zone, often leading to destructive wars on Kurdish soil.

Regional Complicity: More recent reports mention countries like Qatar, Kuwait, and Pakistan as having been complicit in "ethnic cleansing" by funding residential settlements for non-Kurds in Turkish-occupied areas of northern Syria.
European Consortium for Political R
e"

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.