Help support TMP


"You don't play Saga!" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Days of Knights


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

GameCon '98

The Editor tries out this first-year gaming convention in the San Francisco Bay Area (California).


Featured Movie Review


627 hits since 18 Feb 2026
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian18 Feb 2026 11:21 p.m. PST

You were asked – TMP link

Do You Play Saga?

yes, all the time – 1%
yes, often – 5%
yes, sometimes – 8%
yes, rarely – 4%
yes, once or twice – 10%
no – 57%
not any more – 7%
not yet – 5%

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP19 Feb 2026 12:34 a.m. PST

You're right! I don't!

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP19 Feb 2026 3:53 a.m. PST

I see 35% play or have played Saga. I'd be surprised if anything other than DBA and GW products could beat that.

Alakamassa19 Feb 2026 6:23 a.m. PST

Saga made my brain hurt

OSCS7419 Feb 2026 7:38 a.m. PST

To me SAGA has the most interesting concepts of any wargame. The use of fatigue is very unique. Point values are simple but effective.

I understand why some hate it because it is so different.

My problem is the way errata are published. For the Brits they are fine. For Americans it is better to go to the French language errata and use google translator.

Personal logo aegiscg47 Supporting Member of TMP19 Feb 2026 9:14 a.m. PST

I thought Saga was fairly interesting…to a point. Creating your force and matching the various die symbols created a unique combat system. However, tactics seemed to be a fairly low priority and instead players started hunting for die combos to do the most damage, making it a pretty strange skirmish game. On top of that, players who knew their faction had massive advantages over new players (this could be said for many games), but with Saga it seemed even more so. It became one of those games where 60 seconds after game night ended you couldn't name the factions that you had just fought with as everything became subserviant to the dice combos.

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP19 Feb 2026 9:24 a.m. PST

I'm an Atari man myself, but the old ads sure made it sound exciting… what? Oh— "SAga"— my bad.

wink

JMcCarroll19 Feb 2026 2:49 p.m. PST

Battle boards were pure fantasy.

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP19 Feb 2026 7:24 p.m. PST

Too gimmicky for me.

KSmyth28 Feb 2026 7:42 p.m. PST

I've played it a fair amount. It's one of those games that requires regular play and being well-acquainted with one's battle board to be good at it. It's a little gamey, but our SAGA players do their best to help each other figure things out. Fun, doesn't require a lot of figures.

dapeters02 Mar 2026 11:44 a.m. PST

I thought it should have been fantasy Battles, the historic stuff was comical.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.