Help support TMP


"Why so many Rohan foot?" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Warhammer Message Board


Areas of Interest

Fantasy

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Blue Dragon

Rebasing a classic Dragon for new battles.


Featured Workbench Article


Current Poll


302 hits since 14 Jan 2026
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP14 Jan 2026 5:36 a.m. PST

If the Rohan are a horse people, why do the boxed sets appear to be so foot heavy? Is it to give players more figures up front, and they can buy cav as the want to?

Personal logo 20thmaine Supporting Member of TMP14 Jan 2026 5:48 a.m. PST

Helms deep – and other strongholds of the Mark – were mostly defended on foot.

Quite hard to form a shield wall on horse back.

Not everyone in Rohan could afford a war horse.

YogiBearMinis14 Jan 2026 5:52 a.m. PST

I also think it is the Helms Deep effect.

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP14 Jan 2026 6:25 a.m. PST

Ah, that makes sense. I presume an army in the field would have more horse.

Personal logo 20thmaine Supporting Member of TMP14 Jan 2026 7:24 a.m. PST

Other thpoughts –

Cavalry aren't so great in dense woods, or on mountainsides, or towns and cities.

The town guard probably are better off on foot.

Eomer's reconnaissance force was all horse – but if they ever wanted to hold somewhere, they'd have to dismount. Similarly, the expeditionary force to support Gondor was all cavalry because they wanted to get there quickly, and as a Gondor ally, the main specialty they brought was cavalry filling a vital niche.

Griefbringer14 Jan 2026 7:51 a.m. PST

In the Return of the King there are several instances which refer to dismounted Rohirrim:

1.) At the battle of Pelennor Fields, Eomer prepares to gather his men to form a shieldwall on foot and do a last stand, when all hope seems lost.

2.) During the battle of Pelennor Fields, many Rohirrim lost their mounts, but survived to fight themselves. Of the Rohirrim that accompany the expedition to Gates of Mordor, half are on foot due to having lost their mounts.

3.) For the battle at the Gates of Mordor, it seems that the whole force dismounts to form a defensive position around the two small hills, though this is not entirely clear.

Andrew Walters14 Jan 2026 10:01 a.m. PST

Tww other boring reasons:

All-horse armies with typical rules don't work well for many reasons.

All-horse armies are expensive, both in dollars and points.

Mostly I think it's the first.

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP14 Jan 2026 11:32 a.m. PST

You could set up two factions for a Civil War game – the horse-riding Rohan & the Foot-bound Rowan.

The latter group inspired by Saruman?

Eumelus Supporting Member of TMP14 Jan 2026 1:13 p.m. PST

Should also be pointed out that Erkenbrand of the Westfold and his thousand warriors who relieved the siege of Helm's Deep were all on foot (Gandalf on Shadowfax was the only rider among them).

JMcCarroll14 Jan 2026 3:00 p.m. PST

The king was there so he had his guard on foot.

evilgong14 Jan 2026 4:40 p.m. PST

One of the lost tales / posthumous books describes Rohan infantry types in a bit of detail.

T probably erred by not giving the Rohan multiple horses per man – historical horse armies tended to do this, with an established system to allow re-mounting mid battle – at least for the better off classes.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.