"How is Battle Command Ancient and Medieval different?" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Medieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article Dervel  returns from Mexico with a new vision for making palm trees from scratch.
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Tango01 | 10 Oct 2025 12:56 p.m. PST |
"Battle Command (as a series) – as well as Field of Battle, have at their core the focus on key decisions, command and control, and friction on the battlefield. That is handled by the use of a card sequence deck. However, those decks, and the use of those decks is very different from Field of Battle compared to Battle Command. In Field of Battle, each army's CiC rolls their command die (ranging from a D8 to a D12+1, the larger the better). The difference in those rolls give the number of initiative points for each army. Side A then turns cards and acts on them one at a time. When they are done, Side B does the same from their sequence deck. Sequence decks are 27 cards or so…" wargamesandstuff.blogspot.com
Armand
|
| Sydney Gamer | 10 Oct 2025 5:47 p.m. PST |
|
| Tango01 | 11 Oct 2025 3:23 p.m. PST |
A votre service mon ami… Armand |
| Tango01 | 20 Oct 2025 4:40 p.m. PST |
Discussion of Battle Command Ancient and Medieval
link
Armand |
|
