Help support TMP


"Worthy of Praise: The Dutch Army in the War of ..." Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset

Micro Napoleonics


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

The Gates of Old Jerusalem

The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


562 hits since 5 Jul 2025
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP06 Jul 2025 3:00 p.m. PST

…Liberation and the Hundred Days 1813-1815

"When the first hastily organized Dutch troops fought off the French at Breda in December 1813, their commander wrote that their behavior under fire had been worthy of praise. In order to prove to the allies the Dutch were willing and able to help drive away the French, a new army had to be built from scratch. When Napoleon returned from exile in 1815 and marched his army into the newly formed Kingdom of the Netherlands, he met a Netherlands contingent of professional soldiers, fully armed, equipped, and dressed, and ready to defend the regained independence…"

picture


Main page


link

Armand

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP16 Jul 2025 10:27 a.m. PST

So good to read anything about units other than those of GB or France in the 1815 Campaign. "Dutch" is equated with "Netherlands" in this link and the word "Belgian" never appears once. OK, I accept that, strictly speaking, the country as such did not exist for a while but many such a United Netherlands unit would be less than pleased to be called "Dutch" and their contribution was far greater than anyone, esp the DoW, ever expected. We hear criticism of "Anglocentric" every day, what about "Dutchocentric"?

Lilian17 Jul 2025 9:30 a.m. PST

No…bis repetita…
TMP link

Prince of Essling17 Jul 2025 12:16 p.m. PST

Need to read:

Réponse aux allégations anglaises sur la conduite des troupes belges en 1815 par un officier général
Bruno Renard
Brussels 1855
link

which fortunately for non-French readersT was translated into English by Jonas De Neef:
PDF link

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP18 Jul 2025 3:40 p.m. PST

Thanks

Armand

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP25 Jul 2025 12:33 p.m. PST

I did think Prince of Essling's post of Renard's translated account of the Belgian contribution to the only important battle of the Napoleonic Wars (stir up) was fascinating, but curiously seemed to downplay the Belgian role! It starts by explaining that they had an excuse for being less than enthusiastic, which seemed to support the traditional "English" xenophobic view. It calls Krahmer's battery "Dutch" although the members were mostly Belgian, whatever the commander's nationality. The Belgian's fought far better than expected against their traditional allies, all seem now to agree. Especially as they were shortly to fight a war against their "United Netherlands" comrades, the "Dutch" (OK, no such nation, to this day, I admit)

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP29 Jul 2025 9:20 p.m. PST

Thanks also my good friend…


Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.