"The Case for a Next-Generation Heavy Bomber" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
Featured Movie Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 03 Jul 2025 10:10 p.m. PST |
Continued advances in stealth, automation, and precision-guided munitions make the strategic reliance on stealth bombers increasingly questionable. The growing sophistication of air defense networks and the proliferation of hypersonic and autonomous strike platforms diminish the survivability and cost-effectiveness of stealth bombers such as the B-21 Raider, which is slated to enter service this decade… Proceedings Magazine: link |
 John the OFM  | 04 Jul 2025 8:09 a.m. PST |
I'm reminded of how the IDF took out "primitive" F-14s, as if they were Sopwith Camels. |
 Legion 4 | 04 Jul 2025 8:42 a.m. PST |
Yes, the B-21 may still be useful. Even if it won't be fielded within a decade. By that time they find themselves out of a job with AI, etc. As we see more and more the drone in all its forms may be the next real "King of battle" … "primitive" F-14s, Yeah those should have been in museums instead of in parts … |
| Fitzovich | 04 Jul 2025 11:35 a.m. PST |
I'm firmly in the bring back the B-36 school of thought. A big airframe with lots of standoff weapons. |
|
