"Vauban's Wars Revisited" Topic

" I have set the siege up again to have a little play. It's been getting on for three years since it was last out on the table. I refer to 'the siege' because the initial layout is always going to be pretty much the same. These photos may therefore look familiar.

One change that we decided was necessary was to start the game with some of the second parallel already built, and that's what you see above. I want to test whether that means that any adjustment needs to be made to the force sizes or to the opening values of food, powder, morale etc. I hope not, and that's the way I'm going to try it first. Having re-read the rules I'm not sure we gave sufficient weight to blind spots around the bastions during previous games, although as it was so long ago I may just have forgotten. One aspect of addressing that which requires some thought – and possibly the manufacture of player aid or two – is that my bastions don't have as acute an angle as would have done in real life or as the rules assume. The main reason for that is simply to make the table footprint more manageable, although it also makes it easier to put the cannon and figures in them. As I say I need to have a think about how to match the rules to the terrain…"

Epictetus – Discourses on Wargaming

link

Armand

Very impressive figures and table.

Glad you enjoyed them my good friend…

Armand

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but I'd suggest that until your fortress ground plan is accurate, and you're obviously aware this one isn't, you are unlikely to get a correct simulation and will therefore end up having to try and write 'fudge it' rules to solve the problem, which may be a struggle.

Glup!

Armand

PaperTerrain has accurate Vauban fortresses.

Thanks

Armand