Help support TMP


"One man’s arm decided the Battle of Gettysburg" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Brother Against Brother


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd ACW Infantry: On Parade

Celebrating another milestone with my Union army.


Featured Workbench Article

Building Langton's 1/1200 Scale U.S.S. Cumberland

David Conyers of Aire Brush Painting Service tells how he builds and paints 1/1200 scale ACW ship.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.


Featured Book Review


477 hits since 8 May 2025
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Captain Sensible08 May 2025 4:38 p.m. PST

I've been reading a bit about the Battle of Gettysburg and the attack on the Little Round Top that was famously defended by the 20th Maine. Tell me if you think what I have done below is fair. I'm just having a bit of fun with this.

There is an old English saying as follows:

For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
For want of a horse the rider was lost.
For want of a rider the message was lost.
For want of a message the battle was lost.
For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.

If I apply this to what happened on Little round Top, it might read:

"For want of an arm…": Confederate General John Bell Hood, leading a division in Longstreet's corps, was wounded early on July 2, losing the use of his arm to artillery fire.

"…a command was lost.": Hood's injury left his division without direct leadership at a critical moment, passing control to subordinates not fully read in on the original plan.

"…a plan was shattered.": The Confederate attack on the Union left flank lacked coordination due to this leadership disruption and poor communication.

"…the brigades were scattered.": Units like the 15th and 47th Alabama attacked without support, out of alignment with the rest of the division.

"…the assault was piecemeal.": Instead of a concentrated blow, attacks came in staggered waves, allowing Union defenders to repel them one at a time.

"…the flank held.": The 20th Maine, anchoring the Union's extreme left on Little Round Top and fighting without support from other regiments in their brigade, held firm against multiple Confederate assaults, eventually charging downhill to break the final one.

"…the line stood.": Because the flank didn't collapse, the entire Union position on Cemetery Ridge remained intact,

"And all for the want of an arm…": Hood's injury set off the chain. Had he stayed in command, it's conceivable the Confederate left attack could have been better organized and timed, very possibly changing the entire course of the battle and the war.

donlowry09 May 2025 10:26 a.m. PST

A valid thesis.

martin goddard Sponsoring Member of TMP09 May 2025 11:03 p.m. PST

Nice story.
I suspect that large events are "outcomed" by a combination of actions. Some more impactful than others.

There are many stories of "the action that won WW2……"
The exception does prove that there is a rule. e.g. the chap with the keys to the plan to counter any dash by the Bismarck or Tirpitz.


martin

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.