Help support TMP


"Giant crossbows in Dragon Rampant." Topic


12 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Fantasy Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Fantasy

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Rag'narok


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Cheetahs

Wyatt the Odd Fezian paints some fast cats.


Featured Book Review


527 hits since 30 Mar 2025
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP30 Mar 2025 10:43 p.m. PST

I was just given 2 giant crossbows. These are 3d printed siege weapons that look exactly like those used by Saruman at Helm's Deep.

As it happens, I now have a Half-orc army. It was easy to cut the weapons off of some spare Half-Orc pikemen for crew. I am now painting crew & bolt-shooters. They should look good.

However, I'm at a loss to fit them into "Dragon Rampant" – our rules of choice.

They could be placed as 'Heavy Missiles' but these then have some inappropriate factors – notably attack & maybe move. I guess I could add a troll to show how they could be moved but these machines are *not* going to charge anyone.

Leave this out? That would make sense but in a game system where there's a tight balance of points, why would I take a unit that can't use all the factors that presumably come with the point cost?

Should I lower the unit point cost to '3' (from '4') or just suck it up? Any other ideas?

Eumelus Supporting Member of TMP31 Mar 2025 12:08 a.m. PST

There isn't really a close fit for artillery in the "Dragon Rampant" rules. Heavy Missiles is your best fit – I wouldn't worry about the Attack capability, since (a) they would need to pass a 7+ activation to do so and (b) even if they succeed they'd need 6s to hit. Under those circumstances it's highly unlikely they'll charge anybody – but if they do, visualize it as a desperate sortie by the artillerists, leaving the engines behind to be brought forward in case of victory or (more likely) retreated to in case of repulse. As for the movement, didn't the Romans have carts to transport their ballistae about?

If you feel OK leaving the book categories, I've had game success with treating various types of artillery as Light Missiles with no Attack activation, 24" range, but only 6 Strength Points.

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP31 Mar 2025 2:15 a.m. PST

Interesting. I'll mull over your suggestions. Many thanks.

Col Durnford Supporting Member of TMP31 Mar 2025 7:15 a.m. PST

My house rules.

1) crew of 4

2) missile attack as 12 with full crew 6 with half crew.

3) defend at 6 dice.

I also have one unit made up of 2 trolls with much better hand to hand options.


Fully agree the crew may charge not the weapon.

Personal logo Sgt Slag Supporting Member of TMP31 Mar 2025 7:55 a.m. PST

I'm going to suggest that you reach out to the author of the rules system. Artillery (Ballista, Catapult, Trebuchet) are all common in both ancient and medieval weapons of history. Read up on the RW historical Greek engineer, Archimedes, and his final battle against the Romans, for a good laugh, and a good eye-opening experience.

Artillery should be covered in every pseudo-ancient and pseudo-medieval fantasy set of rules. Perhaps the author forgot to include them in the final version released? Cheers!

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP31 Mar 2025 3:51 p.m. PST

@ Slag. Thanks but I think the response would be – & rightly so – tweak it to suit yourself.

@ Col Durnford. So you pretty much follow the 'Heavy Missiles' stats? I think it might be best to have a few games doing this & see if it's a problem before changing anything.

Col Durnford Supporting Member of TMP01 Apr 2025 7:31 a.m. PST

I don't have the book in front of me, however, I believe it's call ponderous weapons.

In my collection, I have two catapult and one ballista with 4 hobgoblins each. I also have a ballista crewed by two trolls.

I can't recall, but I believe some giants can toss rocks and I would expect a similar effect.

Stoppage01 Apr 2025 11:27 a.m. PST

Sorry – I don't want to p#ss on your camp-fire, but:

Trolls live in caves under low-light conditions. Assuming that that is their natural milieu then you might assume they would be blinded by the sun when outside:

-2 on chance to hit under occluded skies
-3 on chance to hit under sunshine

Col Durnford Supporting Member of TMP01 Apr 2025 12:13 p.m. PST

I thought the historical records said they live under bridges and fear goats!

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP01 Apr 2025 3:38 p.m. PST

Saruman has bred trolls that wear sunglasses & can operate in daylight (it *is* fantasy after all).

Tgerritsen Supporting Member of TMP01 Apr 2025 11:46 p.m. PST

Apparently Mersey wrote up some rules on artillery. They are quoted on this guy's set of siege rules on page six at the link here- PDF link

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP02 Apr 2025 5:23 a.m. PST

Many thanks. The artillery unit can't move but I guess, like everything else in the "dragon' rules, it can fire @ 360 degrees.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.