/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory [TMP] "question m47 tank 90mm gun v russian t-10 tank again" Topic

 Help support TMP


"question m47 tank 90mm gun v russian t-10 tank again" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board

Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2014) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Beer and Pretzels Skirmish (BAPS)


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:100 M901 ITV Tank Destroyers

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian added anti-tank elements to his NATO forces in WWIII: Team Yankee.


691 hits since 9 Mar 2025
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

wardog09 Mar 2025 1:45 p.m. PST

first attempt got hit by bug
quick question
in the 1950s most of nato had the m47 tank with 90mm gun
the russians had a tank called t-10 heavy tank
how would the m47 90mm gun have performed against the armor of the t-10

Wackmole909 Mar 2025 2:24 p.m. PST

US heavy M103 tank, armed with a 120-mm gun, was only built in small numbers in the early 1950s and UK with Conquour

Martin Rapier10 Mar 2025 9:16 a.m. PST

The M36 90mm gun shells used in the M47 would just have bounced off the T-10, unless they were using tungsten cored ammo at close range.

The M47 did have a ROF about three times higher than the T-10 though.

Pretty well everyone gave up on Heavy Tanks once MBTs were developed.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.