Help support TMP


"1st Airborne Recce Unit Flash" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Painting Guides Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Battleground: World War II


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

28mm WWII German Riflemen in Greatcoats II Revisited

A more wintry portrayal of German Riflemen with Greatcoats II.


Featured Workbench Article

WWII North Africa Painting Guide - The Basics

Monkeylover Fezian covers the basics for this WWII theater of war.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's Rural Fields and Fences

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian gets his hands on some fields and fences.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


418 hits since 5 Mar 2025
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Artilleryman05 Mar 2025 2:30 a.m. PST

As part of my ongoing British Airborne project I have now arrived at the 1st Airborne Recce Squadron jeeps. There sems to be a question over the unit flash on the vehicles. The 'Pegasus' is straight forward but the unit '41' is variously portrayed as having a horizontal division between the colours and a diagonal one. The latter seems appropriate for recce troops but can anyone give a definitive source to answer the question?

Personal logo Dal Gavan Supporting Member of TMP05 Mar 2025 3:42 a.m. PST

G'day, Artilleryman. The recce tac plates were coloured green over blue, the number in white. The full range of 1st AB can be seen at link

Artilleryman05 Mar 2025 4:00 a.m. PST

Thanks for this. I have these charts and they seem quite clear showing the division between the colours as horizontal. However, I have also seen the division represented as diagonal. I am wondering which is accurate.

John Armatys05 Mar 2025 5:26 a.m. PST

All my sources show horizontal division of the colours. What is your source for diagonal division?

"Definitive" in your question is a problem – "One interesting omission from the May 1944 file list of serials is any reference to airborne forces. In an appendix to 1 Airborne Division's war diary dated 13 March 1944 there is a list of postal addresses which also gives the serials of the units concerned. … it provides the fullest primary source list seen so far. It suggests that the serials were based on, if not entirely congruent with, those of a standard infantry division. Although the list does not give the arm of service colours there is no reason to suppose that they were in any way different from their equivalent in other formations and in the list below the probable colour has been indicated in italics …." (from page 96 of British Military Markings 1939 – 1945, Peter Hodges and Michael D Taylor, Cannon Publications, 1994, which is listed in the bibliographies of all my other sources).

Martin Rapier05 Mar 2025 6:48 a.m. PST

The only diagonals I can in my books see for Airborne units are RASC companies, the recce is shown as horizontals. We've all got access to the same reference materials, so it would be very hard for someone to claim your recce flashes are 'wrong'.

Douglas Firbank in his memoir 'I bought a Star' actually served with 1st Airborne Recce Squadron but sadly he seemed more interesting in fighting the Germans than noting what colour the flashes on his jeep were!

Artilleryman05 Mar 2025 9:19 a.m. PST

Horizontal makes sense. Thanks everybody.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.