"The Infamous Birth of the Custer Myth" Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to The Old West Message Board
Areas of Interest19th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 13 Jan 2025 4:01 p.m. PST |
"The following piece has previously appeared on the June 25 anniversary of what the Sioux and Cheyenne call the Battle of the Greasy Grass, known to most Americans as the Battle of the Little Bighorn…" Main page link
Armand |
Wackmole9 | 13 Jan 2025 4:47 p.m. PST |
What Custer myth is still in common uses anymore? He is not a mythical hero, just a Commander who made a bad series of choice and got himself & his men killed for it. Source is very questionable Portside Material of Interest to People on the Left
|
Nine pound round | 13 Jan 2025 9:06 p.m. PST |
Graham's book is an excellent supplement to his book on the Little Big Horn, and quotes extensively (but not without expurgation) from Benteen's letters, and includes summaries of his conversations and correspondence with various survivors whom he knew, including Winfield Scott Edgerly, and Edward Settle Godfrey. For a book published in 1953, he pulled surprisingly few punches (although I have wondered if he waited so long to publish it after his first book to avoid offending Elizabeth Custer's sensibilities- I believe she was still alive when his first book was published). |
John the OFM | 13 Jan 2025 9:16 p.m. PST |
+1 Wackamole I'm in my 70s and can never recall anything about Custer that didn't portray him as a buffoon. The movies were things to laugh at. Is there a "myth" that he was somehow competent? No. The Truth about Custer was always there. |
John Leahy | 13 Jan 2025 9:29 p.m. PST |
I have a deep interest in the LBH battle. I have studied it for 50 years. I am quite familiar with it. That article didn't really say much other than discuss the myth factor. Ok, there is a myth about the battle. Custer wasn't a genius but he also wasn't a fool who had a stupid plan. He was ill served by his subordinate commands. He made some bad decisions. He paid a price along with his command. The Indians paid a price too. Nobody won in the long term. Thanks. John |
Tango01 | 14 Jan 2025 2:23 p.m. PST |
|
Nine pound round | 14 Jan 2025 9:10 p.m. PST |
Graham's "Custer Myth" was a bit of a misnomer- more of a de-mythologizing, not just of Custer, but of the 7th Cavalry. It's hard to read Benteen's account of the Washita or the assertion that Custer impregnated an Indian woman without feeling these incidents diminish the man, just as you feel after reading Godfrey's recounting of Benteen's claim that Reno wanted to abandon the wounded: nobody emerges the better from that story, either. Really, admirable soldier though Benteen was, his feuding with the men around him tends to demonstrate the corrosive effect of a too-combative personality on a unit. |
Tango01 | 15 Jan 2025 3:05 p.m. PST |
|
DJCoaltrain | 15 Jan 2025 4:03 p.m. PST |
Hello John. Just dropping in for a quick chat. I've been at it as long as you have, possibly longer. I'm in my late 70s now. I can't recall anyone who said Col Custer was a genius, but by all accounts he was courageous, maybe too much so. And, he had an abundance of confidence in his trooper's ability to overcome any military problem he felt/thought they might encounter. However, The Colonel faced an "out of context problem." This time the Indians had an insurmountable advantage in numbers, and they stood their ground to fight. Both of which meant the Colonel's standard military plan to solve the standard military problem was woefully inadequate. Also, having served a couple tours at the "Puzzle Palace" where there are "five sides to every story," I have a keen appreciation for internecine squabbles. Colonel Custer's subordinates were not the worst and dumbest, but they were not the best and brightest. Sadly, there were failures in the command structure top to bottom. The 7th also had, perhaps too many, new recruits. BTW – The decision to leave the swords behind weakened the melee capability of the 7th. How much so is conjectural, but it had to diminish melee combat success. Cheers |
John Leahy | 16 Jan 2025 7:23 p.m. PST |
Hi, there's been a discussion going on and off for years about for want of a sword at the LBH. Personally, I am not one who believes they mattered. I am very aware of the shortcomings of the 7th in command, quality, training and more. My comments normally are directed to those who believe that Custer was a glory hound or an idiot. His plan was stupid and he was looking to possibly become president. Just so silly. He made several mistakes. He felt that the Indians were going to slip away. What the Indians did at the LBH campaign had not happened before. Stand and fight. But you know all this as we have talked about time and again. Thanks. John |
|