Help support TMP


"Imperial Knights v Chaos Knights" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Warhammer 40K Message Board

Back to the Korean War Message Board

Back to the Blogs of War Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Modern
Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Another Giant Succulent

Another day, another succulent.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


273 hits since 6 Jan 2025
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP06 Jan 2025 3:52 p.m. PST

..The Battle of Chosin Reservoir


""Mission command is the Army's approach to command and control that empowers subordinate decision making and decentralized execution appropriate to the situation" (Department of the Army [DA], 2019, p. 1-3). Army doctrine publication (ADP) 6-0 states that mission command relies on critical and creative thinking from subordinates that seize the initiative to develop plans and concepts to accomplish the mission (DA, 2019). Additionally, the mission command process requires leaders who understand and assume the appropriate risk levels to operations, not risk-averse or risk-tolerant. The Battle of Chosin Reservoir highlights some positive and negative takeaways of mission command from both the Chinese and American sides. The battle also spotlights where mission command and other components of mission command did not occur, causing blind spots leading to the withdrawal of United Nations (UN) forces from northern Korea. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Battle of Chosin Reservoir and analyze the successes and failures United States (US) Army's approach to mission command principles, the elements of command and control (C2), and the C2 warfighting function…"


More here


link


Armand

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP06 Jan 2025 3:52 p.m. PST

"WarhammerCommunity I've been playing TENTH! #New40k We're persevering, I think this is my 4th game of 10th edition now, which is double what I played of 9th. Anyway, I was taking my Knights [Lancer and 3 Warglaive] against Liam's Chaos Knights [Rampager, Desecrator and War Dog Carnivore]. We're still confused with setting up. We got Dawn of War, but the mission was the Ritual, where you deploy objectives in No Man's Land [that's all I read]. I won deployment and took the near side, trying to keep the terrain between me and Liam's big guys so I can put my objectives out of his reach. My secondary was 2VPs per unit killed [yeah right], while Liam had to defend his home objective for 3VPs per turn! I was so screwed…"

picture


picture


picture


Confessions of a 40k Addict Blog


link


Armand

Bunkermeister Supporting Member of TMP06 Jan 2025 4:43 p.m. PST

Warhammer 1953.

Bunkermeister

Disco Joe06 Jan 2025 5:36 p.m. PST

So the idea is to mix Korean War and Warhammer 40K?

Tgerritsen Supporting Member of TMP06 Jan 2025 6:38 p.m. PST

The bug strikes Tango!

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP06 Jan 2025 8:34 p.m. PST

You bet!… (smile)


Armand

Dave Jackson Supporting Member of TMP07 Jan 2025 6:17 a.m. PST

You never know, DiscoJoe…you never know….

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP07 Jan 2025 2:56 p.m. PST

Ha!…

Armand

Oberlindes Sol LIC Supporting Member of TMP09 Jan 2025 7:52 a.m. PST

Why not?

But should you put Warhammer forces into a Korean War scenario, or set up a Korean War situation (like a planet nearly lost to Chaos and a small Imperial force holding a tiny outpost, like the Pusan Perimeter) in the Warhammer universe?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP09 Jan 2025 3:00 p.m. PST

Oberlindes + 1

Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.