Help support TMP


"Revisiting British Early Medieval Battles: Nechtansmere" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Oddzial Osmy's 15mm Teutonic Crossbowmen 1410

The next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!


Featured Movie Review


298 hits since 5 Jan 2025
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP05 Jan 2025 3:53 p.m. PST

…. The Aberlemno Stone and the Battle of Nechtansmere

"The next episode of my attempts to revisit the British early medieval battles I wrote about in Miniature Wargames between 1983 and 1986 will be about the battle of Nechtansmere in 685. Since the 1980s there have been two whole books on this battle. Interest in Pictish history and (especially) archaeology has blossomed since I wrote about Nechtansmere in 1984 and to some extent those books come out of that. Another key development, in the 1990s, was the linkage of the Aberlemno Stone (well, the rear side of the Aberlemno Cross, or Aberlemno 2 to be exact: figure 1, below) and the battle of Nechtansmere. A couple of articles in Northern History, by Craig Cessford and Nicholas Hooper discussed whether the depiction of a battle on this stone was or was not evidence for ‘Anglo-Saxon cavalry' and suggested that the scene depicted the battle of Nechtansmere. If it did, then it is a precious piece of information, but does it? I honestly can't decide. I appreciate that this sort of indecisiveness drives many wargamers mad, but if it's certainty you want, either wargame a different period or don't claim you're doing historical wargaming!…"


Main page


link

Armand

gavandjosh0205 Jan 2025 7:01 p.m. PST

thanks

Druzhina05 Jan 2025 9:24 p.m. PST

Very interesting.

Druzhina
Picts on Pictish Stones

BillyNM05 Jan 2025 11:43 p.m. PST

Fascinating!

It surely must depict the Picts fighting another culture as the two sides are depicted as uniformly different to each other, especially with regard to hair and clothing. The ‘Picts' seem to wearing something like a kirtle, while the ‘Anglian' leader has something that looks like a hauberk, he also appears the only ‘Anglian' whose horse isn't nag-tailed and wearing a large (ornate?) saddle cloth.

Trying to make out a sequence is really hard without knowing whether the Picts had a convention for this. Didn't they use Ogham which goes bottom to top? This would make the top the pursuit which looks more likely given the depiction as a chase with discarded arms. The problem here is that the ‘Anglian' leader appears to be dead at the bottom, which surely isn't the start – do the accounts say he was killed early? If so who is running away?

Unfortunately, I know nothing about Nechtansmere like whether there was more than one important leader on the losing side.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP06 Jan 2025 2:41 p.m. PST

A votre service mes amis…

Armand

Personal logo piper909 Supporting Member of TMP06 Jan 2025 10:04 p.m. PST

Dang, the "Scots" lose again!!!

Curse those flatlanders!!!

(Interesting article!!)

Druzhina07 Jan 2025 3:39 a.m. PST

The problem here is that the ‘Anglian' leader appears to be dead at the bottom, which surely isn't the start – do the accounts say he was killed early? If so who is running away?

It wouldn't be unusual for the same character to appear multiple times, compare images of the Legend of Saint Ladislaus of the 14th & 15th Centuries, where a character can appear 4 or so times.


Druzhina
Illustrations of Hungarian Costume & Soldiers

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP07 Jan 2025 3:05 p.m. PST

Thanks

Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.