"The Exculpating Myth of Accidental War" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article We've got helicopter door gunners, but no helicopter!
Featured Workbench Article Adam gets to paint a cool figure, and then paint his dead counterpart.
Featured Profile Article The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01  | 12 Dec 2024 4:06 p.m. PST |
"The risk of war by miscalculation is a popular scholarly subject and a frequent concern of policymakers. Theories of war by miscalculation assume either ignorance by decisionmakers, bad faith by policy participants (usually the military), or a mechanistic series of exchanges that obviate the need for policymakers to display judgment and responsibility. Yet historians struggle to produce evidence that political leaders were either ignorant of the risks they were choosing or emasculated from any ability to affect the course of events. Theories of accidental war are, as Geoffrey Blainey has said, "a description masquerading as an explanation."[1] Instead of explaining historical events, the myth of accidental war provides an intricate puzzle for intellectuals, a justification for moralists to fear military subversion of political decisionmakers, and an evasion of culpability for those decisionmakers…" Main page
link
Armand |
 Legion 4 | 13 Dec 2024 10:25 a.m. PST |
"Those who don't study history are bound to repeat it." … Of course the Military and Intel advisors can recommend CoAs, etc. to the POTUS, etc. But does not mean the POTUS and his Admin will have to follow it. E.g. the horrific A'stan withdrawal … |
| Legion 4 | 13 Dec 2024 10:25 a.m. PST |
"Those who don't study history are bound to repeat it." … Of course the Military and Intel advisors can recommend CoAs, etc. to the POTUS, etc. But does not mean the POTUS and his Admin will have to follow it. E.g. the horrific A'stan withdrawal … |
|
