"The Exculpating Myth of Accidental War" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Profile Article Can Harriers protect Sea Apaches and Seahawks from hostile Tornados and Mirage 2000s?
Current Poll
|
| Tango01 | 12 Dec 2024 4:06 p.m. PST |
"The risk of war by miscalculation is a popular scholarly subject and a frequent concern of policymakers. Theories of war by miscalculation assume either ignorance by decisionmakers, bad faith by policy participants (usually the military), or a mechanistic series of exchanges that obviate the need for policymakers to display judgment and responsibility. Yet historians struggle to produce evidence that political leaders were either ignorant of the risks they were choosing or emasculated from any ability to affect the course of events. Theories of accidental war are, as Geoffrey Blainey has said, "a description masquerading as an explanation."[1] Instead of explaining historical events, the myth of accidental war provides an intricate puzzle for intellectuals, a justification for moralists to fear military subversion of political decisionmakers, and an evasion of culpability for those decisionmakers…" Main page
link
Armand |
 Legion 4  | 13 Dec 2024 10:25 a.m. PST |
"Those who don't study history are bound to repeat it." … Of course the Military and Intel advisors can recommend CoAs, etc. to the POTUS, etc. But does not mean the POTUS and his Admin will have to follow it. E.g. the horrific A'stan withdrawal … |
| Legion 4 | 13 Dec 2024 10:25 a.m. PST |
"Those who don't study history are bound to repeat it." … Of course the Military and Intel advisors can recommend CoAs, etc. to the POTUS, etc. But does not mean the POTUS and his Admin will have to follow it. E.g. the horrific A'stan withdrawal … |
|
