"1/144 Armour for my Salerno Project" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Models Review Message Board Back to the 1:144 Scale Message Board Back to the 10mm WWII Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
World War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article When combatpainter  criticized a recent Workbench entry, I challenged him to show that he could do better... 
Featured Profile Article Paul Glasser reports on the debut of Axis and Allies: Guadalcanal and the North African expansion.
Featured Book Review
|
| Ryan Rabies | 01 Dec 2024 7:11 p.m. PST |
Here is my next YouTube where I review the models I will be using for my Salerno project. In order to get the proper marks of the tanks, I will be using a combo of plastic and 3D printed resin plus some minor scratch building here and there. I will do a more in depth build and paint video on each vehicle type as I go. The main German armoured vehicles for this period were Panzer IV Ausf. G and H's plus StuG III Ausf. G assault guns. This suits me fine as I have always liked Panzer III's and IV's more than Panthers and Tigers for some reason. The main American tracked vehicles for Operation Avalanche were M4 and M4A1 Shermans along with M-10 tank destroyers. In order to get earlier Shermans I had to go with 3d prints, but I am not disappointed. here is the link to the YouTube video: youtube.com/watch?v=JmkjYfmKmO4&t=17s |
| machinehead | 02 Dec 2024 1:20 p.m. PST |
Interested to see how they paint up. Subscribed |
| Captain Pete | 03 Dec 2024 2:04 p.m. PST |
I am interested to see these when you get some painted. I have the same sort of issue with the GHQ 1/285th Shermans on the hatch. It does seem more common to see them opened from side to side rather than front to back. |
|
