ColCampbell | 27 Nov 2024 1:18 p.m. PST |
I found this report to be very discouraging. After an expensive restoration it appears that no one in the state of Texas wants the USS Texas to 'clutter' their seaside view. link Jim |
79thPA | 27 Nov 2024 2:56 p.m. PST |
You would think this would have been worked on before 60 million dollars was spent. Is the USN silent on the issue? |
42flanker | 27 Nov 2024 3:16 p.m. PST |
i'd a thought in Lubbock they'd be glad of any kinda seaside view. |
DisasterWargamer | 27 Nov 2024 3:50 p.m. PST |
|
McKinstry | 27 Nov 2024 4:08 p.m. PST |
Can the State step in and deal with the NIMBY and funding issues? |
Desert Fox | 27 Nov 2024 4:08 p.m. PST |
Tow it to NYC, dock it next to the Intrepid… |
Inch High Guy | 27 Nov 2024 4:09 p.m. PST |
|
John the OFM | 27 Nov 2024 4:18 p.m. PST |
|
Murphy | 27 Nov 2024 4:34 p.m. PST |
79th…the USN has no say so as she was purchased from the USN by the state in 1947 and moved to San Jac in 1948. The issue simply has to deal with the fact that one seafood place, (Katy's), raised a fuss about the placement of the battleship, claiming that it would block the views of the harbor for their customers. Their "views" include a shipyard, and a pier where a Carnival Class Cruise Liner sits. The other issue has to do with the fact that the Galveston Wharf Board of Directors, the Texas Battleship Foundation and the Texas State Wildlife Commission couldn't come up with an acceptable date in the required time to have a meeting about the requirements needed by the state for the ship to be berthed at Pier. TSWC kept pushing the meeting date off until it was too late. There's a lot of smoky back room politics also going on, if you are familiar with that section of Galveston, and the people on the board. Galveston truly IS the best place for her. However she can't be at Seawolf park, and the area that they were going for is the best optimum point for her. Desert Fox. No. She stays in Texas waters. |
79thPA | 27 Nov 2024 5:21 p.m. PST |
Murphy, I know the navy doesn't own her, but I figured they might be able to help find a spot for her. |
LostPict | 27 Nov 2024 7:59 p.m. PST |
I used to work with the US Navy Memorial ship program. These ships are basically on an indefinite loan from the US government and subject to revocation of the ship if they not properly maintained, displayed, or becomes a hazard. It's a congressionaly mandated program that requires the USN to inspect and review the status of each of the memorial ships annually. So the Navy does have a say in her future. As I recall, her deteriorating condition was of much concern to the Navy and she was in danger of revocation. Good thing she was fixed up and hopefully an appropriate home will be found. link |
piper909 | 27 Nov 2024 9:27 p.m. PST |
Better link to the original: link |
Augustus | 28 Nov 2024 1:46 a.m. PST |
You know something, I say too damn bad. Need to start declaring Emminent Domain actions and get this sh** done. I am sick and tired of people referring to history as clutter. It's your history, moron, respect it and the fact someone else cluttered their life saving yours. |
JMcCarroll | 28 Nov 2024 4:32 a.m. PST |
I'm sure the Russians or Chinese would take her! Being an upgrade compared to their ships. |
Red Jacket | 28 Nov 2024 6:51 a.m. PST |
The article simply states conclusory reasons as to why she cannot return to San Jacinto. I would like to know the basis for those statements. |
Fitzovich | 28 Nov 2024 8:06 a.m. PST |
Seems rather silly to have spent the money on the overhaul without a definitive plan to locate the ship afterwards. |
Andrew Walters | 28 Nov 2024 9:17 a.m. PST |
It definitely seems weird to spend that money without a long term plan, but do people not understand that wherever you dock it people are going to fly in and spend money in your town? |
Murvihill | 29 Nov 2024 5:04 a.m. PST |
There's already two museum ships on Pelican Island, across the bay from Galveston, Not sure why it didn't end up there (other than the fact that everything is covered with pelican poop). |
Choctaw | 29 Nov 2024 3:37 p.m. PST |
Negative on the Eminent Domain. You must not be a property owner, and certainly not in Texas. Eminent Domain is draconian to put it nicely. Extremely leftist if I were to tell the truth. |
Old Contemptible | 29 Nov 2024 11:20 p.m. PST |
Well the Texas Department of Transportation is a frequent user of Eminent Domain. Rather ruthlessly I might add. They have no ideological issues with it. Hawaii, New Jersey, Virginia, Alabama, North Carolina never seems to have an issue with their battleships. But Texas seems to always have some issue with BB-35. Bottom line is the state needs to make this happen. Either move it back to San Jacinto or move it to Seawolf Park. The state is the only entity to have the money and resources to do it. I think Seawolf Park is the ideal location. But the state will have to commit to maintaining the ship. I am sure the State of Texas does not want to be in the ship preservation business, but there really isn't another option for now. If the ship is on renewable loan to the State, then technically the Navy can terminate the loan. But this has been a little murky. I understand the State paid to have the ship. If it is anything like the USAF Heritage program which allocates aircraft to museums then the Navy could terminate the loan. But I don't know the exact wording of the agreement. I have seen similar situations. A museum has had a aircraft in its collection for decades assuming it belongs to them until someone from the Air Force comes to inspect the aircraft to asses it's condition. Surprise! The aircraft still belongs to the Air Force. |
Old Contemptible | 29 Nov 2024 11:33 p.m. PST |
If I was the director of a maritime museum, I would be running around with may hair on fire to get this ship. |
piper909 | 30 Nov 2024 9:34 p.m. PST |
I love how Old Contemptible has set out the basic facts. The State of Texas has a history of utter negligence in terms of taking responsibility for this unique, historic ship. (Which deserved a BETTER NAME!!! Given how its namesake has been like a crappy first husband to it. Perhaps a campaign to rename it the OKLAHOMA would see some remedial action?) This has all been stewing a long time, but I had thought some solution had been worked out by now, and I was very wrong. (Well, I've been out of the state since the COVID year, and this issue is not widely reported within Texas or elsewhere.) Why can't some advocacy group hold Texas officials' feet to the fire, at least embarrass them a little over this neglect? They are all quick enough to posture and grandstand over immigrant issues. |
ScottWashburn | 01 Dec 2024 4:57 a.m. PST |
Historic ships are always a tricky issue. The USS Olympia in Philadelphia has almost been lost to the scrapyard several times for lack of funds but seems reasonably safe now. But just a mile down the river the SS United States has finally lost its battle to stay alive. It's been sitting there rusting for 30 years, but now the money has finally run out and it's due to be towed to Florida and sunk to make an artificial reef. :( |