"About Default Walled cities in the Napoleonic era" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 25 Nov 2024 4:01 p.m. PST |
"I know that defending walled cities had fallen out of practice by the time gunpowder had become a staple in European armies by the year 1700s. But I have a few questions such as: was there ever a time during the Napoleonic Wars where a walled city was defended by the garrison on the walls while firing at them with a musket from above? Also, why was it that every time (especially for Paris, Berlin, Vienna, and Moscow) that an army was marching on the capital, they didn't even bother to defend their city through the walls or on the streets?…" From here
link
Armand |
ScottWashburn | 25 Nov 2024 4:54 p.m. PST |
There were a number of sieges during the wars, although they were mostly of the Vauban style fortifications rather than the older medieval curtain walls and castles. Unfortified villages and cities really were not very good defensive positions, so you don't see too many actions like that although there certainly were some. |
Garryowen | 25 Nov 2024 5:04 p.m. PST |
There were a few attacks on medieval walled cities in the 1809 Austrian campaign. Ratisbon (or Regensberg) was one. Ebelsberg was another. The capitals commonly capitulated to save the city from destruction. Moscow was a different situation. The Russians burnt it after vacating it to deny its benefits to the French.. The "rules of war" at the time seem to have allowed the attacker to justifiably loot the city if he had to fight to take it. Also, it seems that once the attacker entered the city, the defender generally lost the fight. Tom |
Nine pound round | 25 Nov 2024 5:15 p.m. PST |
I don't have my copy of Osprey's "Fortresses of the Peninsular War" handy, but you might find that several towns on both sides of the Portuguese frontier come close to meeting that description- I'm thinking of Badajoz, but Ciudad Rodrigo and Campo Mayor were similar. They had some of the Vauban-style outworks (glacis, covered way), but those protected medieval walls that had been somewhat updated, rather than a conventional artillery fortress (I seem to recall that Almeida was- but it covered the best invasion route into Portugal). These fortifications had basically been updated over the years, but by building on and around older fortifications, and updating them, rather than razing them and starting from bare ground. |
Sydney Gamer | 25 Nov 2024 5:27 p.m. PST |
India 1780-1806… many examples. |
Tango01 | 26 Nov 2024 4:29 p.m. PST |
|
Murvihill | 27 Nov 2024 4:51 a.m. PST |
|
|