Help support TMP


"Three Ages of Rome review" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Battle Reports Message Board

Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board

Back to the Ancients Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Babylonian Spearmen from Castaway Arts

We look at spearmen from Castaway Arts' new Babylonian line.


Featured Workbench Article

From Fish Tank to Tabletop

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian receives a gift from his wife…


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Personal logo Editor Julia Supporting Member of TMP would like your support for a special project.


Featured Book Review


1,193 hits since 5 Nov 2024
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0105 Nov 2024 3:29 p.m. PST

"This week we have been learning a new set of rules slated for our next campaign – the Three Ages of Rome. As the name suggests the focus is on Republican, Imperial and Late Romans plus their enemies. The book runs to 160 pages – the rules are about a third of the book with the rest giving some historical intros, some basic wargames concepts and finally some lists and scenarios. Its basing agnostic but recommends 120mm frontage for 20/25mm and 80mm frontage for 6/10/15mm…"


link


picture


picture


picture


Cirencester Wargames

link


Armand

0101skl03 Dec 2024 2:47 p.m. PST

I have tried these rules in a couple of battles but my impression of them has not improved with experience.

A report on a first try out with the rules is here : link

An extended battle report and reflections on the rules can be found here : link

Keef4405 Dec 2024 9:01 a.m. PST

@ 0101skl: Thanks for the links. I agree with your conclusions, but continue to persist with the rules due to their simple and easy-to-learn nature. Adjusting them to one's liking is a pretty simple process.

Keith Flint.

0101skl05 Dec 2024 12:55 p.m. PST

@Keef44 : I very much agree with you on the simple and easy to learn nature of the rules – and think that the army lists are again a simple way to get into a lot of interesting match ups. You are probably right about the simplicity of modifying the rules. I may go back to them but for the moment am occupied with other projects.

Keef4408 Dec 2024 9:02 a.m. PST

Very understandable. Spending time fixing other people's rules isn't everyone's favourite type of wargaming! There are always other projects to enjoy.

0101skl18 Dec 2024 3:05 p.m. PST

@Keef44 : I have started trying out your proposed rules and have posted a report here link

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.