/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory [TMP] "Three Ages of Rome review" Topic

 Help support TMP


"Three Ages of Rome review" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Battle Reports Message Board

Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board

Back to the Ancients Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

l'Art de la Guerre


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Cavemen & Giant Armadillos!

DJD Miniatures runs amok with a diorama of cavemen and the giant prehistoric armadillo!


Featured Profile Article

GameCon '98

The Editor tries out this first-year gaming convention in the San Francisco Bay Area (California).


1,010 hits since 5 Nov 2024
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP05 Nov 2024 4:29 p.m. PST

"This week we have been learning a new set of rules slated for our next campaign – the Three Ages of Rome. As the name suggests the focus is on Republican, Imperial and Late Romans plus their enemies. The book runs to 160 pages – the rules are about a third of the book with the rest giving some historical intros, some basic wargames concepts and finally some lists and scenarios. Its basing agnostic but recommends 120mm frontage for 20/25mm and 80mm frontage for 6/10/15mm…"


link


picture


picture


picture


Cirencester Wargames

link


Armand

0101skl03 Dec 2024 3:47 p.m. PST

I have tried these rules in a couple of battles but my impression of them has not improved with experience.

A report on a first try out with the rules is here : link

An extended battle report and reflections on the rules can be found here : link

Keef4405 Dec 2024 10:01 a.m. PST

@ 0101skl: Thanks for the links. I agree with your conclusions, but continue to persist with the rules due to their simple and easy-to-learn nature. Adjusting them to one's liking is a pretty simple process.

Keith Flint.

0101skl05 Dec 2024 1:55 p.m. PST

@Keef44 : I very much agree with you on the simple and easy to learn nature of the rules – and think that the army lists are again a simple way to get into a lot of interesting match ups. You are probably right about the simplicity of modifying the rules. I may go back to them but for the moment am occupied with other projects.

Keef4408 Dec 2024 10:02 a.m. PST

Very understandable. Spending time fixing other people's rules isn't everyone's favourite type of wargaming! There are always other projects to enjoy.

0101skl18 Dec 2024 4:05 p.m. PST

@Keef44 : I have started trying out your proposed rules and have posted a report here link

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.