Help support TMP


"Why Cavalry Reconnaissance Failed in August 1914" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Early 20th Century Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

More 15mm Boxers from Cellmate

Tod gives us another look at his "old school" Boxer Rebellion figures.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


423 hits since 29 Oct 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP30 Oct 2024 4:02 p.m. PST

"All armies entered the war with large bodies of cavalry. In 1914, reconnaissance was exclusively the realm of the horsemen, although cavalry had additional missions related to being a mobile strike force. In the opening campaigns, all sides made extensive use of cavalry as forward reconnaissance elements and flank security and counter-reconnaissance forces. In Belgium and France, the Germans weighed the largest portion of their horse soldiers to the large German flanking maneuver in Belgium. In spite of the employment of these units, both sides entered battle with a dearth of information about the dispositions of the opposing forces. While the German cavalry was successful in counter-reconnaissance, advancing infantry forces often found themselves suddenly opposed by unexpected Belgian or French resistance. On the other hand, defeating the German cavalry consumed the French cavalry to the extent that it was ineffective in both reconnaissance and counter-reconnaissance roles…"


picture

More here


link

Armand

TimePortal30 Oct 2024 7:16 p.m. PST

Any type of reconnaissance value depends on how higher command uses the data.poor analysis means poor utilization.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP30 Oct 2024 7:23 p.m. PST

Sometimes (many times) reconnaissance reports don't jibe with the preconceived opinions of the Big Yuns.

GildasFacit Sponsoring Member of TMP31 Oct 2024 3:19 a.m. PST

Senior command in both armies insisted on keeping strict control of forward forces yet were too far from the front (and continually shifting their positions) to get timely information from the cavalry recce. Being the pompous incompetents that some of them were, they blamed the cavalry rather than their own inadequate staff work.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP31 Oct 2024 2:54 p.m. PST

Thanks

Armand

Nine pound round03 Nov 2024 3:40 p.m. PST

Most of those cavalrymen were conscripts, with at most a year or two with the colors. Even with long service officers, the level of practical experience in a task that generally demands a fair amount of fieldcraft cannot have been high.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP04 Nov 2024 2:51 p.m. PST

Thanks also… by memory there were some big problems with the use and training of the horses too… the hight ranking officers didn't take into account how much a horse can be used untill it failed due to exhaustion…

Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.