Help support TMP


"Nagasaki" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII in the Pacific Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea
World War Two in the Air

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Microscale LCT(5) from Image Studios

Thinking to invade German-held Europe? Then you'll need some of these...


Featured Profile Article

Playing the Kokoda Track

On the Kokoda Track at Council of Five Nations.


668 hits since 9 Aug 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

skipper John09 Aug 2024 5:30 a.m. PST

We remember today as the day the USA got even with Japan for Pearl Harbor. Happy Nagasaki Day.

Bezmozgu7 Supporting Member of TMP09 Aug 2024 5:34 a.m. PST

Who are the we?

ElliesdadUK09 Aug 2024 8:58 a.m. PST

Being British (rather than from the USA) whenever I hear that word my first associated thought is "Back in Nagasaki where the fellers chew tobaccy and the women wicky wacky woo".

😉

Grattan54 Supporting Member of TMP09 Aug 2024 10:05 a.m. PST

Could just be me but I don't find the deaths of 35,000 people by an atomic explosion anything to celebrate. I accept it helped end the war and all the death a suffering it caused.
But it was a horrible way to die.

Irish Marine09 Aug 2024 12:04 p.m. PST

So was a slow death trapped in an upside down Battleship. So, yeah I'm not sorry.

pzivh43 Supporting Member of TMP09 Aug 2024 12:28 p.m. PST

I understand Grattan's point. But I celebrate the tens of thousands of lives saved on both sides because the Japanese surrendered, and we didn't have to invade the home islands.

Fitzovich Supporting Member of TMP09 Aug 2024 1:49 p.m. PST

Grattan54, I completely agree.

Wackmole909 Aug 2024 3:19 p.m. PST

Its always so Easy looking back on a event in the past and take on the position of Judge/Jury/Exacutor. You wern't there and really have no Skin in the game.
My father was training in B-29 after getting screwed out of his Points earn in the ETO. So no Bomb and maybe he dies and there by me. For me its a personal and I would trade 35,000 Enemy Civilians for my Father Living and there by Me.

dogtail09 Aug 2024 6:16 p.m. PST

Pearl Harbour 68 Civilians dead

Nagasaki 40-80 000

Dwight D. Eisenhower about the Atomic Bombs: First on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of ‘face.

Celebrating Nagasaki is weird

Personal logo Old Contemptible Supporting Member of TMP09 Aug 2024 9:49 p.m. PST

Not a single Japanese unit surrendered during the Asian/Pacific War. Only a tiny percentage had been engaged by U.S. Forces. There were three million Japanese troops on the Asian Continent. The Japanese home islands had never been conquered.

What was the alternative to an atomic bomb? The Navy and Air Force wanted to blockade and bombard. Millions of Japanese would have starved to death. The 1945 rice crop had failed. Not to mention the fate of our POWs. It would have been horrific.

The Army wanted to invade. The Japanese had amassed a huge Army in Kyushu. The invasion went from being a three-to-one ratio in favor of the Allies, by late July it was one to one. Even Marshall was having second thoughts. It is estimated that 20 million Japanese would have perished in an invasion.

Marshall feared that support for continuing the war was waning. There was a movement afoot to negotiate an end to the war which was exactly what the Japanese were hoping for. American industry was already clamoring to go back to producing civilian products. Was there time for a blockade and bombardment to take effect?

The firebombing of Tokyo killed more Japanese than either atomic bomb, the Japanese government didn't care about the suffering of their people. You tell me what the alternative was?

Do you want to be the President who had a way of ending the war but did not take advantage of it, condemning so many American and Japanese to their deaths? After the war, he would have been impeached.

Real, actual war is nothing to celebrate.

ZULUPAUL Supporting Member of TMP10 Aug 2024 5:42 a.m. PST

Well I celebrate it. My father was a sniper/scout USMC and had a 17minute life after he fired his first shot. So he was told. He was to be ashore 8 hrs before first naval "prep" of landing area.

dogtail10 Aug 2024 6:48 a.m. PST

Old Contemptible wrote:
"Real, actual war is nothing to celebrate."

Exactly

Col Durnford Supporting Member of TMP10 Aug 2024 7:31 a.m. PST

One more item in the cost of not ending the war with Japan with the bomb, the Soviets were on the verge of joining the war against Japan. Anybody want to guess how much of Asia would get the same occupation as Eastern Europe?

Imagine, if you will, Japan divided as was Germany.

Personal logo Old Contemptible Supporting Member of TMP10 Aug 2024 10:45 p.m. PST

A North and South Japan was an issue at the time. However, the Soviet Union did not have the sea lift capacity in the Pacific. The Soviets wanted a zone of occupation in Japan as they did in Germany since they contributed to the Allied victory over Japan although belatedly.

The Soviets managed to occupy some of the Kuril Islands using torpedo boats, mine trawlers, and what few transports they had to land troops. They had planned to land in Hokkaido but abandoned the plan due to the lack of transport and political concerns.

Personal logo Bobgnar Supporting Member of TMP11 Aug 2024 2:17 p.m. PST

remember, every Japanese person over 15 was a potential "soldier", trained to use pikes or anything to repel the invaders.

Choctaw12 Aug 2024 9:40 a.m. PST

The mere fact that it took being nuked twice before surrendering speaks volumes about the will of the Japanese military to continue fighting.

Personal logo Herkybird Supporting Member of TMP30 Aug 2024 12:26 p.m. PST

I know its a cold sentiment, but I am sure people wanted to know the true effect of nuclear weapons on populated cities.
They have provided lots of useful data.

In a way the atomic bombings helped both sides in the future Cold War develop their M.A.D policies, which, it can be argued, kept the world from a nuclear apocalypse.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.