Help support TMP


"Academic Distain for Wargaming" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Historical Wargaming in General Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Ætherverse: Upheaval


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Stan Johansen Miniatures' Painting Service

A happy customer writes to tell us about a painting service...


Featured Profile Article

More Wood at the Dollar Store

Need larger bases for large models or dioramas?


Current Poll


549 hits since 18 Jun 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Zardoz

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP18 Jun 2024 5:22 p.m. PST

"Academic disdain for using wargaming as a tool is a classic example of legacy skills being allowed to override innovation in the academic world. This attitude also explains the near complete absence of academics from professional wargaming; one would expect that military historians would be embedded in professional wargaming, bringing their extensive knowledge to bear. As I wander around the strange world professional wargaming I do not encounter many academic historians, especially after Phil Sabin went to South America.

Stating the obvious, the military and supporting civilian services use wargames for training, education, force development, and practising war fighting. The computer industry uses cyber wargames continually to test business continuity. Education uses games as there is a huge track record of application and value. Emergency planning uses exercises; these use many of the techniques from wargaming. Many disciplines use the tools of wargaming and would think anyone challenging their professional use to be very strange indeed. There are parallels in other disciplines where new tools have been resisted by academics for decades…"


Main page


link

Armand

UshCha19 Jun 2024 1:29 a.m. PST

Compared to 22 windbags kiking a bag of wind about and calling it a hobby, makes me realise that I have no appologies or concerenS about folk calling my hobby "stRange".

My experience is that many (not all) achedemics are unfit and impractials, Professional wargaming (like say an excersize of a sfaty drill), is practical and vitaly useful. But to many achedemics this means coming out of the Library and maybe not having a good dinner that day. Well that is certainly not proper achedemics.

However we must be aware there are at least in the UK, saner types, we have historians that have those skills, but I guess to make the "Manstream Slakers" feel better they call themselves experimental acrchiologists. Many vital new insights have come frome these guy's.

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP19 Jun 2024 8:09 a.m. PST

I sympathize with the academics. Change is unsettling and a day in the library stacks followed by a good meal is more relevant to many individuals than being useful to the "real" world.

TimePortal19 Jun 2024 8:30 a.m. PST

As a professor and with multiple degrees, I learned early on that the key to expanding knowledge is individual research.
For example, I learned more about Napoleonic era history doing research on painting uniforms than I ever learned in the course on Napoleonic Europe.

There is an academic dislike for gaming. The level or intensity depends on the school.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP19 Jun 2024 3:53 p.m. PST

Thanks


Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.