Help support TMP


"Agano-class cruiser explained" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board

Back to the WWII in the Pacific Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea
World War Two in the Air

Featured Recent Link


Featured Showcase Article

Victory as a Campaign System

Can a WWII blockgame find happiness as a miniatures campaign system?


Featured Workbench Article

Blind Old Hag's Do-It-Yourself Flight Stands

How Blind Old Hag Fezian makes flight stands for 1/300 scale aircraft.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: 1:100 Armoured Flame-Thrower Platoon

Looking for something new for your Late-War WWII German forces?


Featured Book Review


510 hits since 15 Jun 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP15 Jun 2024 5:11 p.m. PST

"The four were light cruisers operated by the Imperial Japanese Navy.[1] All were named after Japanese rivers. Larger than previous Japanese light cruisers, the Agano-class vessels were fast, but with little protection, and were under-gunned for their size (albeit with a powerful offensive torpedo armament, able to launch up to eight Type 93 "Long Lance" torpedoes in a salvo). They participated in numerous actions throughout World War II…"

Main page


link

Armand

troopwo Supporting Member of TMP16 Jun 2024 8:30 a.m. PST

I like the Aganos.
They were intended as destroyer squadron leaders.
Designed to replace some of those over worked great war cruisers.

Far better use of time and money than the Katori training cruisers. Indeed, might have been better of with another three or four of these instead of the Katoris.

They make a nice comparison to the RN Arethusa.

I thought they had four long lance with another four reloads though. Nice re-use of 6" guns from battleship modernizations, although not the best 'turrets' as I understand it.

I always thought that the later IJN Oyoda could have been a much better thing dropping the float[lanes and given a third turret in X or Y. Much more potential for the use of all those spare triple 6.1" gun turrets.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP16 Jun 2024 4:11 p.m. PST

Thanks

Armand

troopwo Supporting Member of TMP16 Jun 2024 5:12 p.m. PST

Yeah two quad long lance, my bad.
Better than I remembered.

Murvihill17 Jun 2024 4:00 a.m. PST

Japanese doctrine included small cruisers as headquarters for destroyer and submarine squadrons. Tailored to the job, the Aganos had to be as fast as the destroyers, while the Katoris only needed to match subs or convoy escorts. The UK's small cruisers were built to patrol the far reaches of the empire.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP17 Jun 2024 3:39 p.m. PST

Thanks also..

Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.