Editor in Chief Bill  | 11 Jun 2024 7:41 a.m. PST |
You were asked – TMP link What is your preferred figure scale/size for ACW miniature wargaming (land battles)? 46% said "15mm" 12% said "28mm" 7% said "10mm" |
robert piepenbrink  | 11 Jun 2024 7:50 a.m. PST |
I'm still holding out for "it depends." Skirmish game with a bunch of friends and solo Gettysburg on a card table are both ACW, but they do not have the same requirements. (I don't have a preferred screwdriver, either: I pick the one suitable for the job.) |
TimePortal | 11 Jun 2024 8:25 a.m. PST |
I have been selling 15mm since 1983. Only recently carried 28mm but supply is sporadic. Never had a problem with 15mm resupply. |
Disco Joe | 11 Jun 2024 9:14 a.m. PST |
All of my ACW figures are 28mm and I really like them. Not a fan of 15mm. |
0ldYeller | 11 Jun 2024 9:57 a.m. PST |
My ACW stuff is old school – 1/72. |
martin goddard  | 11 Jun 2024 1:59 p.m. PST |
My favourite 15mm ACW that I bought were the Minifigs strips back in the 1970s? Anyone remember those? martin.
|
advocate | 11 Jun 2024 2:57 p.m. PST |
As so often, I agree with Robert. |
TimePortal | 11 Jun 2024 4:18 p.m. PST |
Martin, they were referred as first generation or strip 15mm. My first minis as well. The second edition were known for their thick rectangular bases. A few releases were called 2nd generation-transition which were thin rectangular bases. The third edition were thin bases in a eight sided form. Not sure what was the terms used in Britain. In the USA during the 1970-80s that is what we used as players or when I dealt with distributors. |
Wolfshanza  | 11 Jun 2024 10:20 p.m. PST |
Have ACW in 15 and 28. Have 15 for Fire and Fury, 28 for Black Powder and skirmish. |
Martin Rapier | 11 Jun 2024 11:59 p.m. PST |
My ACW stuff is all 6mm. Just saying…. |
Tortorella  | 12 Jun 2024 1:25 p.m. PST |
Mine too, no other scale creates the the impression of massed figures like 6mm. I use 15mm for skimish games. 6mm may not be as artistic, but IMO it gives you masses of troops that can represent whole armies in a reasonable space and look like the large units they are supposed to be. Not critical to a game, but my aesthetic preference. |
Old Contemptible  | 13 Jun 2024 10:13 p.m. PST |
I use 15mm only. 28mm is too big for the larger battles. It's not just the figures there are all the 28mm buildings and terrain. I don't play skirmish. I'm not too fond of the look of 15mm skirmish anything. 6mm is basically a board game |
Tortorella  | 14 Jun 2024 8:07 p.m. PST |
OC…have you ever seen Bruce Weigle's work? A good 6mm table is not a board game to me. There are plenty of rules that work just fine. Towns look like towns. |
Augustus | 15 Jun 2024 8:24 a.m. PST |
10mm all the way. The ignorance of the scale difference was shocking to me when I compared 15mm to 10mm, as the savings amount to roughly 65% savings in square footage (or doubling depending on how you look at it) but if you are living in an apartment/condo, there is no comparison between the scale advantages of being in 10mm versus 15mm. |
TimePortal | 16 Jun 2024 7:17 a.m. PST |
My friend who is 76 just shifted from 15mm to 10mm. I can no longer paint due to health issues. Back in 1979 when I was painting 10 to 20 battalions, 12-16 man units, of every Napoleonic nation and ACW, I used 15mm. I was play testing and demoing rules. If 10mm had been around, I would have went that route. |
Tortorella  | 17 Jun 2024 9:02 a.m. PST |
Personal preference. While I own a variety of scales, I ultimately found that 15mm and up satisfied my attempts at artistic painting, while 3mm – 10mm made for better games, both for massed armies appearance and practical aspects like cost and space to play. |