Help support TMP


"Female representation in wargaming" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the SF Discussion Message Board

Back to the Warhammer 40K Message Board

Back to the Wargaming in General Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of Kung Fu


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Relthoza Swarm-Class Cruisers

Again from Blue Table Painting - this time, the Swarm-class cruisers for the Relthoza aliens.


Featured Profile Article

Report from ReaperCon 2006

Michael Cannon reports from last May's ReaperCon 2006.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,454 hits since 3 Jun 2024
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP03 Jun 2024 4:20 p.m. PST

"
Our post about sexism in Kingdom Death prompted a reasonable amount of discussion, and made us realize that there was more that could be said about how women are represented in miniature gaming. When seeing a game which objectifies women as much as Kingdom Death does, it is easy to look at other games which don't portray women as egregiously, and give them a pass. In reality, all of the popular miniature companies today have issues with female representation.

Because it is assumed that the default, "neutral" gender of any model is male, which is itself a problem, miniature companies bend over backwards to let you know that a model is female, using certain coded visual elements. These indicators are numerous, including 1) armor that accentuates their breasts (often called boob-plate), 2) wearing less than their male counterparts, 3) being in provocative poses, and 4) having bare/unhelmeted heads…"


Main page


link

Armand

Louis XIV Supporting Member of TMP03 Jun 2024 4:52 p.m. PST

If you're not going to make male and female models look different, why even bother assigning gender?

If the game does not have male and female models behave differently: males stronger, etc. again why bother? Oh, and may God have mercy on your soul if try… in an RPG, gender should impact stat lines yet still allow for Brienne of Tarth or Sam Tarley

Stryderg03 Jun 2024 5:49 p.m. PST

All of my Space Marines are so heavily armored that you can't tell their sex. As for the Termigants and Genestealers, if you get close enough to detect the difference, you won't live long enough to tell anyone about it.

Bunkermeister03 Jun 2024 9:00 p.m. PST

A big ho hum. Not enough women representation in the Ultimate Fighting Champions, and professional football either. Most sports and games even segregate men and women into separate teams.

Let the markets decide and make what people want. Not everything has to have social engineering.

Bunkermeister

Raptoruk369 Supporting Member of TMP03 Jun 2024 11:24 p.m. PST

+1 Louis XIV

I agree with the article in that the portrayal of women in our gaming spheres is generally wrong. I was however surprised to read that in arguing its wrong and there should be no difference (helmet on/off aside) with that of a male figure they then pad their article out with conversion opportunities and how to represent females in our various games. If a woman looks the same as a man in war (agreed) then the only way to show this accurately is an unhelmet head choice, that's it imo

arthur181504 Jun 2024 3:12 a.m. PST

In the black powder era, there are several examples of women who served, disguised as men, their sex only being discovered after they were wounded (Hannah Snell) or died (James Barry) so I can happily claim – should I want to – that any of my redcoats are actually female without undertaking any conversions!

Louis XIV Supporting Member of TMP04 Jun 2024 3:38 a.m. PST

segregate men and women into separate teams.

Current events to the contrary: Lia Thomas anyone?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP04 Jun 2024 3:10 p.m. PST

Thanks

Armand

The H Man15 Jun 2024 1:44 a.m. PST

Hmm…

Toy soldiers date back far beyond this modern nonsense.

Back when women were not allowed to be soldiers (in most, particularly British, instances).

Not so bizarre then that wargames of these times and modern variations follow such a rule.

But if you do put women in a game/range, it's deemed bad because they my be attractive to the male market.

As you can't win, we may as well stick to the attractive women.

If anyone complains, tell them you'd rather not have unattractive women.

If you get a hard time about lack of clothing on the women, agree that you too think women in uniform are hotter, but these are the only figures you had to hand. And perhaps they are "ladies of the night," so it probably is their uniform.

I don't think there is a resolution to this.

Sticking to historicals can help.

As RPG/wargaming is, and certainly was, viewed as a lonely male nerdy thing, the fact attractive women figures are popular is forever ingrained in its DNA.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP15 Jun 2024 3:46 p.m. PST

Thanks also…

Armand

Stalkey and Co10 Sep 2024 5:33 p.m. PST

While I think it is sexist and ridiculous how [particularly British] miniature manufacturers represent females in the miniatures hobby [huge boobs, and somehow high heels at all times even though they are bad for your ankles and useless in athletic events] it really doesn't matter.

43 years of tabletop gaming, the only women who play are in the boardgame side of things. Zero encounters with female miniature players of historical or any other type.

Since they don't participate in the market who cares what they think?

My wife thinks it's a complete mystery why anyone would invest time and energy in the miniatures hobby. I don't bother to ask why.

Personal logo etotheipi Sponsoring Member of TMP11 Sep 2024 1:54 p.m. PST

Thank God that this discussion (including the OP referenced post) isn't full of people focusing on their self-selected narrow view of margaming and proclaiming it to be universal.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP23 Sep 2024 4:35 p.m. PST

(smile)


Armand

Der Krieg Geist29 Dec 2024 11:19 a.m. PST

female representation in wargaming…… I don't care.

The H Man30 Dec 2024 3:51 p.m. PST

To answer the top post.

"1) armor that accentuates their breasts (often called boob-plate), "

I thought this would be more comfortable? Besides most women don't want to wear men's things. And if your going to have women, don't you want to tell them apart on the table top, so people can check you have the required ratio?

"2) wearing less than their male counterparts, "

Again, seems to be something women do. Go to your strip on a Saturday night, whatever the weather, and see who's wearing the least.

"3) being in provocative poses,"

I'm not sure I've ever seen a woman (between 18-40) who's not in a provocative pose. I'm not sure how you would possibly pose them otherwise.

" and 4) having bare/unhelmeted heads…"

Now your calling space marines girls. And so many more.

Women can wear the same chest plate as men, but not the same head wear? That's contradictory.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP30 Dec 2024 4:32 p.m. PST

Thanks


Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.