
"2nd Scottish Wars of Independence" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Product Reviews Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Command figures for the 1410 Teutonics.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Book Review
|
Dave Knight | 26 Mar 2024 2:22 p.m. PST |
Who makes the best figures in 28mm? |
Col Durnford  | 26 Mar 2024 2:59 p.m. PST |
Old Glory is always my first stop. |
Korvessa | 26 Mar 2024 6:34 p.m. PST |
I like these guys: link IIRC They're from Scotland. I live in Calif and didn't have problems with shipping. |
Col Durnford  | 27 Mar 2024 8:34 a.m. PST |
I'm starting in on this period myself. What's you take on the use and types of shields? My research, to this point, suggests the rank and file only had small round and not much of them. |
DFrameJ  | 29 Oct 2024 4:21 p.m. PST |
Seriously considering this for both TtS and Saga Age of Chivalry. I looked at Antediluvian and they are fantastic. But I've recently invested in a good resin printer so think I'll go that route. Medbury Miniatures has what looks to be a pretty comprehensive range of late 13th-early 14th-century Scottish. |
greenknight4  | 03 Nov 2024 2:04 p.m. PST |
I print Medbury for myself and my business. Great minis. I personally do them in 28mm and 40mm scales. |
uglyfatbloke | 19 Dec 2024 7:35 a.m. PST |
13th C stuff is seldom if ever any use for the 14th C. There's only really 4 troop types; men-at-arms, spearmen, archers and hobilars, though the hobilars would fight on foot. Medbury pikemen are pretty sound; the rest of the range is best avoided. Pikemen should have AT LEAST a padded jacket, armoured gloves and a helmet. The primary weapon for men-at-arms was the lance or…..the lance; Robert I's defeat of de Bohun was remarkable because it was done with an axe against a lance. Order of the day was bacinets; big bucket helmets were like velour flares in the 1990s……nobody was wearing them anymore. Any early HYW stuff is generally fine – Essex have some excellent mounted men-at-arms, but sadly those on foot never have spears. Claymore/Antedilvian stuff is nice. Most stuff marketed as 'Scottish' falls in the range that starts at 'Eh?' and ends at 'No'. There is zero evidence to suggest that highland troops looked any different from Lowland troops – or English of French troops for that matter. Almost all of the fighting consisted to small cavalry actions …..just men-at-arms……or sieges. There was a mere handful of general engagements. The 'Scottish short bow' dear to the hearts of figure designers in the past did not exist; it's a Victorian invention. English troops were not yet using Bills. There's buckets of material in 'Calendar of Documents Relating to Scotland (volumes 2,3 and 5) and there is one specific book (so far as I know) by a suitable scholar – 'The Second Scottish Wars of Independence' (The History Press) by Chris Brown – ahem, kof kof…… |
uglyfatbloke | 19 Dec 2024 7:42 a.m. PST |
PS….if anyone ever finds a suitable set of rules I'd de delighted to hear more. |
|