
"Interesting Article on Art and AI" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Tools of the Hobby Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article Is there finally a gluestick worth buying for paper modelers?
Featured Workbench Article Need custom bases?
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
DisasterWargamer  | 03 Mar 2024 12:10 p.m. PST |
Im using a AI to enhance my gaming – both RPG as well as Historical Gaming link "Artificial Intelligence mimics human learning through algorithms and data analysis, with applications to visual art. Recent advances in AI art generators have raised concerns that these models may replace human artists one day. This paper considers various evidence on artistic quality, public reception, and economic impact to investigate this possibility. I reject the extreme position that AI art will completely replace human artists by highlighting the preference for human art both from important gatekeepers and the public. However, the opposite extreme is equally unlikely due to existing uses and investment in AI art. I conclude that AI and human artists can coexist and even complement one another." |
robert piepenbrink  | 03 Mar 2024 3:35 p.m. PST |
Do any of these people read history? The gatekeepers were very much on the side of manuscript books as opposed to that new-fangled moveable type, and I can remember them running down CDs, instead of listening to wax and vinyl the way God intended. And as for those garish incandescent bulbs replacing gaslight--or, for that matter, gas lighting replacing candles… The steadfast opposition of a critical establishment keeps stuff out of museums and libraries for about half a generation, while it sells like hotcakes to regular people. And these are art critics anyway--people who tell me rotting sharks and dung Madonnas are art, not counting painting by elephants and chimpanzees. As for investment, let me go check the condition of Indiana's canal network, or our passenger railroads…Sorry. Fell into a rant. I expect in a few decades a graphic artist who doesn't use computers will seem quaint and eccentric--like a Renaissance painter doing all his own hands instead of assigning them to some apprentice. But critical opposition and capital investment are about equally irrelevant to the outcome. |
Oberlindes Sol LIC  | 05 Mar 2024 10:18 p.m. PST |
@Robert Piepenbrink: Thank you for great rant, which saved me from going off on my own. |
MilEFEX3030 | 08 Mar 2024 5:17 a.m. PST |
Remember AI is just a web scraper that reflects humanity back at us, it's not "alive" or "sentient". Human creativity will never be replaced. |
annyderby | 20 Apr 2024 12:52 p.m. PST |
I believe that artists and artificial intelligence can work together and complement each other. I don't think that AI will ever be able to completely replace humans. Although I cannot completely deny this. I myself often use ai essay writer, I found https://customwriting.com/ai-essay-writer for this. I have an idea that AI will be able to replace humans only in simple tasks. But mostly he will be as an assistant. In any case, he will think banally. |
|