Help support TMP


"Interesting Article on Art and AI" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Tools of the Hobby Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Lemax Christmas Trees

It's probably too late already this season to snatch these bargains up...


Featured Profile Article

Gen Con So Cal 2005

Our Man in Southern California once again reports on GenCon California-style...


Featured Book Review


460 hits since 3 Mar 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

DisasterWargamer Supporting Member of TMP03 Mar 2024 12:10 p.m. PST

Im using a AI to enhance my gaming – both RPG as well as Historical Gaming

link

"Artificial Intelligence mimics human learning through algorithms and data analysis, with applications to visual art. Recent advances in AI art generators have raised concerns that these models may replace human artists one day. This paper considers various evidence on artistic quality, public reception, and economic impact to investigate this possibility. I reject the extreme position that AI art will completely replace human artists by highlighting the preference for human art both from important gatekeepers and the public. However, the opposite extreme is equally unlikely due to existing uses and investment in AI art. I conclude that AI and human artists can coexist and even complement one another."

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP03 Mar 2024 3:35 p.m. PST

Do any of these people read history? The gatekeepers were very much on the side of manuscript books as opposed to that new-fangled moveable type, and I can remember them running down CDs, instead of listening to wax and vinyl the way God intended. And as for those garish incandescent bulbs replacing gaslight--or, for that matter, gas lighting replacing candles…

The steadfast opposition of a critical establishment keeps stuff out of museums and libraries for about half a generation, while it sells like hotcakes to regular people. And these are art critics anyway--people who tell me rotting sharks and dung Madonnas are art, not counting painting by elephants and chimpanzees.

As for investment, let me go check the condition of Indiana's canal network, or our passenger railroads…Sorry. Fell into a rant.

I expect in a few decades a graphic artist who doesn't use computers will seem quaint and eccentric--like a Renaissance painter doing all his own hands instead of assigning them to some apprentice. But critical opposition and capital investment are about equally irrelevant to the outcome.

Oberlindes Sol LIC Supporting Member of TMP05 Mar 2024 10:18 p.m. PST

@Robert Piepenbrink: Thank you for great rant, which saved me from going off on my own.

MilEFEX303008 Mar 2024 5:17 a.m. PST

Remember AI is just a web scraper that reflects humanity back at us, it's not "alive" or "sentient". Human creativity will never be replaced.

annyderby20 Apr 2024 12:52 p.m. PST

I believe that artists and artificial intelligence can work together and complement each other. I don't think that AI will ever be able to completely replace humans. Although I cannot completely deny this. I myself often use ai essay writer, I found https://customwriting.com/ai-essay-writer for this. I have an idea that AI will be able to replace humans only in simple tasks. But mostly he will be as an assistant. In any case, he will think banally.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.