Korvessa ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 15 Jan 2024 2:45 p.m. PST |
SO I have just started getting into WWII skirmish – after suggestions here I am going with Nuts! I wanted to Normandy US Airborne (specifically 1/507) – but I had to comparmise a bit, as Warlord's Bolt Action paras are in the later uniform and the 1/507th was no longer with the 82nd by then. So as much as it rankled me, I painted them as the 82nd with the 45 uniform and try to forget. But I digress. Anyway what scale tranks do you use? I was assuming 1/56 as that is the scale Warlord uses, then I found this link that suggeste maybe 1/48 would be better: sg-lynx.net/?p=1324 So just curious – what folks use. I presume 1/48 is easier to get. |
Striker | 15 Jan 2024 2:58 p.m. PST |
I use what's cheaper. I had stuck with 1/56 but after a few vehicles I found 1/48 vehicles that were cheaper and I find the scale difference not as important. |
advocate ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 15 Jan 2024 3:57 p.m. PST |
In the tradition of TMP: consider a smaller scale for your infantry. 15mm or 10mm for preference. I'll get my coat. |
Korvessa ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 15 Jan 2024 4:18 p.m. PST |
Advocate LOL And to further the tradition…. I alreday have 4 armies in 15mm WWII (FoW: US Airborne, Winter War Finns, Soviet cannon fodder, German Panzer (early, late) |
Disco Joe | 15 Jan 2024 4:52 p.m. PST |
I have gone with 1/56 and am pleased with it. |
DukeWacoan ![Workbencher Fezian](boards/icons/workbencher.gif) | 15 Jan 2024 5:14 p.m. PST |
I find 1/56 work well with the less chunky figs like Offensive, Perry and Empress. I don't have any Warlord. If you don't mind the expense, you might order a 1/48 and a 1/56 of the same vehicle from Blitzkrieg miniatures and see which you like. Great products. |
Martin Rapier | 16 Jan 2024 2:58 a.m. PST |
I'd stick with 1/56 fir 28mm. We use 1/48 vehicles with our 54mm figures. |
ZULUPAUL ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 16 Jan 2024 4:38 a.m. PST |
I have 1/48 and look OK for me. |
Deucey ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 16 Jan 2024 9:44 a.m. PST |
I always thought 1/48 looked right. I thought I was a minority, but maybe not! I can see the argument of using 1/56 to not take up as much board space though. Kind of the same way buildings are sometimes smaller scale. (Though in BA they're not.) |
MrMagoo | 16 Jan 2024 12:19 p.m. PST |
1/48 is technically the correct scale for 28mm figures, but I've used 1/56 when the latter wasn't available… sometimes you have to go to battle with what you got! |
pikeman666 | 16 Jan 2024 12:58 p.m. PST |
I bought only one, 56mm, since I'm doing a skirmish force. I won't need more than one. For now at least! |
Eumelus ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 16 Jan 2024 1:20 p.m. PST |
I believe that 1:56 (or thereabouts) is actually the "correct" scale for 28mm figures. 1:48 means that 1 inch is four feet, so a six-foot man would be 37mm tall. Now it is true that most 28mm figures have heads, hands, and weapons more in scale with 1:48 than 1:56, but that's a feature of the cartoony exaggerated style that GW and scale creep have trained us to see as unproblematic. But in terms of actual figure height, a 28mm figure won't correctly measure up to a 1:48 vehicle's mud guards, doors, etc. |
smithsco | 16 Jan 2024 4:11 p.m. PST |
I have warlord vehicles and miniatures for WWII. My Marder III's crew is noticably smaller than my German infantry. The vehicles look small too. I don't have 1/48 scale tanks but I assume they'd look better |
Khazarmac | 16 Jan 2024 11:50 p.m. PST |
I prefer thelook of 1/48 scale, I think that it goes better with a chunky 28+mm figure on a base. Find what you think looks good, and stickwith it, as 1/56 and 1/48 don't mix well. |
Tgerritsen ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 17 Jan 2024 2:48 a.m. PST |
Agreed. I went with 1/56 as I believe it is more accurate a scale and never looked back. Pick one that looks right to you and stick with it. The only correct answer is what you prefer on your table. |
SBminisguy | 17 Jan 2024 10:07 a.m. PST |
I've ended up with a mix of tank scales based on what "looks good" to me. I have found that as long as I have all the same type of tanks in the same scale, it works fine. What you don't want to do is have a 1/56th scale Sherman next to a 1/50th scale Sherman, looks silly! In my collection I have ended up with: 1. Most light tanks are 1/56th scale resin and 3D prints 2. Most of my Medium tanks are 1/50 diecast and plastics (Corgi, Solido, etc.) 3. Most of my Heavy tanks are 1/48th plastic kits Here's an example of a 1/50 diecast Solido T-34 painted as a Stalingrad factory tank with 28mm militia figures from Bolt Action:
A 1/50 diecast Corgi Sherman (as a DD tank) with 28mm Bolt Action figures:
|
SBminisguy | 19 Jan 2024 8:06 a.m. PST |
One last thought -- I think sometimes 1/56th scale vehicles can look too small because of how we base the infantry figures. Infantry are usually mounted on a 3mm high base, adding an extra 10% to their height when compared to vehicles. |
Fred Cartwright | 20 Jan 2024 3:38 a.m. PST |
A lot of people base their tanks as well though in which case basing is irrelevant. Even then a 6' tall figure is 38mm at 1/48 so even with a 3mm base your average 28mm figure is going to look small next to a tank at 1/48. |