Editor in Chief Bill ![Workbencher Fezian](boards/icons/workbencher.gif) | 25 Aug 2023 9:47 p.m. PST |
Would you use 1:72 scale and 20mm figures together? * no * yes, but not in the same unit * yes, even in the same unit |
Dye4minis ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 25 Aug 2023 10:26 p.m. PST |
Yes. Mix as required for the game. The little variation in size won't make your dice rolling any better nor worse than if they all were the same size. Remember the goal is to have fun. Your game should not be an IPMS competition. As long as they are "close", you may not even notice while in the heat of battle. |
Old Contemptible ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 25 Aug 2023 10:26 p.m. PST |
Yes, sometimes in the same unit depending on how they look. |
TMPWargamerabbit | 25 Aug 2023 10:40 p.m. PST |
Yes. Vehicles rarely but actual soldier miniatures yes. |
Gunner Dunbar ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 25 Aug 2023 10:49 p.m. PST |
|
nickinsomerset | 25 Aug 2023 11:49 p.m. PST |
Yes, mainly use 20mm figs, but some vehicles and arty/ support weapon crews are 1:72 Tally Ho! |
John Armatys | 26 Aug 2023 1:00 a.m. PST |
|
Martin Rapier | 26 Aug 2023 1:39 a.m. PST |
Yes, of course, although sometimes 1/76 and 1/72 scale vehicles of the same type are so ludicrously different in size that they look daft together. |
Timbo W | 26 Aug 2023 2:00 a.m. PST |
Yes, occasionally I cheat by adding a little cardboard between the base and the figure. |
Artilleryman ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 26 Aug 2023 2:39 a.m. PST |
My vehicles are 1/72 and my figures 20mm. A few figures are 1/72, especially vehicle crews. Having said that, I thought 20mm was 1/72 based upon fitting figures in with HO/OO trains? Please enlighten me. |
Dexter Ward | 26 Aug 2023 3:23 a.m. PST |
Older 20mm are 1:76, newer are closer to 1:72 |
Editor in Chief Bill ![Workbencher Fezian](boards/icons/workbencher.gif) | 26 Aug 2023 4:02 a.m. PST |
Having said that, I thought 20mm was 1/72 based upon fitting figures in with HO/OO trains? Please enlighten me. There's math, and then there's differences in sculpting approaches, and what you can do in plastic versus metal. TMP link |
Artilleryman ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 26 Aug 2023 4:05 a.m. PST |
Thanks Ed. That looks as clear as it can be. |
Striker | 26 Aug 2023 4:33 a.m. PST |
|
20thmaine ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 26 Aug 2023 4:54 a.m. PST |
Yes – sometimes in the same unit and sometimes not depending on how well the "heft" of the figures match up. Actually do the same with plastic 1/72nd – some different manufacturers just don't look good to me mixed in the same unit. But others look fine. So, it depends. |
JMcCarroll | 26 Aug 2023 5:11 a.m. PST |
Why yes I do. I have noticed the 20mm infantry is thicker then the 1/72 plastic infantry. Still close enough for me. |
jurgenation ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 26 Aug 2023 5:43 a.m. PST |
|
huron725 ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 26 Aug 2023 7:23 a.m. PST |
|
Serge69 | 26 Aug 2023 8:05 a.m. PST |
|
smithsco | 26 Aug 2023 8:27 a.m. PST |
Yes in same unit. With height and weight variances it looks normal instead a unit of identical height and weight |
Dagwood | 26 Aug 2023 9:05 a.m. PST |
Based on a man of 1.8m tall, 20mm would be 1/90th. Just saying. I mix Airfix and "20mm" metals. Which are often 22mm or so tall. But some 1/72nd are 25mm and are a bit too big. |
Rich Bliss | 26 Aug 2023 10:44 a.m. PST |
|
Steamingdave2 | 26 Aug 2023 12:16 p.m. PST |
@Dagwood. Most of the "20mm" figures ( AB, Foundry, Fantassin) I have are around 23mm overall. In 1/76 that equates to around 5 feet 9 inches, which seems reasonable for a WW2 soldier, in 1/72 it would be just over 5 feet five and a half, so a bit short.I do have some Empress "20mm" that are about 25mm tall, that is around 6feet 3 inches @1/76. Or 6 feet at 1/72. That might be OK for some well nourished Americans) |
Oberlindes Sol LIC ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 26 Aug 2023 12:40 p.m. PST |
When considering mixing 1/72, 1/76, and 20mm, I apply the scientific principle of "does it look OK?" and proceed from there. The same color scheme helps things look more OK. The same vehicles in slightly different scales, or even in the same nominal scale from different manufacturers, rarely look OK. |
Col Durnford ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 26 Aug 2023 1:01 p.m. PST |
Mostly no. The majority of my figures are 20mm metal and most vehicles are 1/76 with a few minitank soft skins I do have a few 1/72 250 and 251 halftracks and needed to cut down the bed on the 251 just for appearance sake. |
miniMo ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 26 Aug 2023 1:47 p.m. PST |
Yes — 20mm Dark Future and other metal minis + plastic Zombies!!! + other 1/72 plastics. |
Umpapa | 26 Aug 2023 2:16 p.m. PST |
|
bobspruster ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 26 Aug 2023 4:27 p.m. PST |
Yes, even in the same unit. +4 Tom Dye. |
pzivh43 ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 26 Aug 2023 5:19 p.m. PST |
YEs. All the time if they look close, that's good enough. |
Guderian111 | 28 Aug 2023 3:39 a.m. PST |
|
Joes Shop ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 28 Aug 2023 4:55 a.m. PST |
|
Shark Six Three Zero | 28 Aug 2023 6:03 a.m. PST |
Yes, if the size is similar. |
nickinsomerset | 28 Aug 2023 7:56 a.m. PST |
Steaming Dave – ."I do have some Empress "20mm" that are about 25mm tall, that is around 6feet 3 inches @1/76. Or 6 feet at 1/72" – the Kings Company Grenadier Guards! Tally Ho! |
Sgt Slag ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 28 Aug 2023 1:53 p.m. PST |
yes, even in the same unit If you do the math, 72 inches is equal to six feet. Therefore it stands to reason that 1/72 scale is representative of a 6-foot Human, represented by a 1-inch figure, foot sole to top of head. This keeps the math as simple as possible, as well as keeping the scale concept as simple as possible. Since 1-inch = 25.4 mm, you basically have 1/72 scale being one-inch miniatures. But… Only if you want to keep things simple and easy to understand. No one really does that, though. LOL! Today, 1/72 is typically used for 20 mm to 24 mm figures. I fudge it all, mixing 22 mm to 28 mm figures together, as I play fantasy games, and mixing figures of differing sizes works well to represent the various fantasy races: they range from 2-1/2 feet tall, to 7-feet tall! Scale and size are useful for me, but I play loose with them, as well. If I were to be a scale/size Nazi, I would be 3D printing 24/7/365, to get a variety of miniatures in their "proper" sizes. Fudging with the miniatures' size and scale, makes life easier, and I began collecting miniatures in 1993, decades before 3D printing was an affordable hobby. Cheers! |
rmaker | 28 Aug 2023 1:53 p.m. PST |
|
Dagwood | 29 Aug 2023 3:55 a.m. PST |
Sgt Slag, you are correct that 1/72nd should correspond to 25mm. However, as we all know, "25mm figures" are not 25mm tall, but 27 or 28mm; nor are "20mm figures" 20mm tall. More relevant, are the rifles and other arms about the same length ? Or noticeably different ? |
Sgt Slag ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 29 Aug 2023 9:37 a.m. PST |
Scale is a mess, I know. My 1/72 figures are noticeably smaller in body, weapons, etc., from my 28mm figures. Like I said, if I were collecting today, I'd plunge into 3D printing, and make all of my figures properly proportioned to one another, in their proper sizes. Fortunately, my hobby ship sailed before the 3D printer market became accessible. I didn't dodge a bullet, I dodged a 16" Naval Shell! The 3D printing hobby has a steep learning curve, and using the rubber-like resin is expensive; mixes of the pricey rubber-like resin with the less expensive, more brittle resins allegedly works, but I likely would just go for broke, to avoid my miniatures breaking altogether. LOL! I have had too many resin 3D printed models, which I purchased from Etsy sellers, snap off at the ankles, already… The 3D printing route is the only way to get properly sized miniatures, unless you can actually find what you want/need from metal/plastic molding companies. I've mixed and matched many different maker's miniatures, but with fantasy, I have considerably more leeway. Cheers! |
Murvihill | 30 Aug 2023 8:20 a.m. PST |
the mm scales were set up when everyone was making Napoleonic figures and they all wore bizarre headdress. Since the tops of their heads were covered the size was based on a standing man to the eye. Modelling scale was based on equipment and not people, so the ratio was easily measured and calculated. 20mm is 1/72. |
Dagwood | 31 Aug 2023 1:51 a.m. PST |
Murville, except that the eyes of a 1/72nd figure should be around 23.5 mm. You would have thought that a sculptor would have been able to work out the correct height for the eyes, and adjust accordingly. And most sculptors start from a blank "dolly" which has no hat. |
Sgt Slag ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 31 Aug 2023 1:11 p.m. PST |
Agreed, Dagwood. There are all kinds of stories shared to explain away how 1/72 is not a six-foot man, foot-sole to top of head. The reality is that the math clearly demonstrates the ease of using a 6-foot, or 72-inch tall man, reduced to 1-inch, or 25mm tall figure (the 0.4 mm is ignored, for simplicity's sake). I get it, I understand the concept of Napoleonic figures having the top of their heads covered by very tall hats. What I've seen, over the past 30+ years, is that sculptors are not interested in making figures to a specific height or scale. That requires tedious precision -- it ain't easy. I also understand that it is much easier to sculpt larger figures, compared to smaller figures, so Scale Creep is a matter of convenience for the sculptor, and it helps push customers into buying a single maker's line of figures, assuming they all size up closely to each other, from line to line… Ignoring precise figure heights has multiple reasons for existing. I believe that 3D printing can allow its adherents to achieve better sizing of miniatures, if they put the effort into adjusting their STL files, before they print them. Again, it is a lot of tedious work. LOL! I truly believe that we will have fudged scales for miniatures for the foreseeable future, as no one can agree on much of anything. LOL! Cheers! |
etotheipi ![Sponsoring Member of TMP Sponsoring Member of TMP](boards/icons/sponsor.gif) | 31 Aug 2023 3:07 p.m. PST |
Different "scaled" people is fine since people are of different scales. Photographers learn, teach, and write about how to compose a photo that hides distracting non-uniformity of different people.
This is a great example, because you normally don't get this height variation in five people from the same unit. Composition doesn't change the people, but you have to work at it to realize that the officer on the right could easily put his chin on top of the one on the left. The point is not to hide reality, just to keep that specific one fact from becoming the only thing you can focus on in the picture. With larger groups, perspective can help you "normalize" everyone.
For honors and ceremonies, you do the same thing – arrange the people so body morphology differences don't distract from the point of the event. Weapons, however, have less tolerance. Like photo composition for different body types, there are ways to lessen the impact of differently scaled weapons (even ones from the same line of minis). A variety of poses helps a bit, a well as separating "identical" figures. Mixing 1:72 and 20mm is not much of a problem for me. |
The Last Conformist | 31 Aug 2023 11:48 p.m. PST |
Somewhere, perhaps in my parents' garage*, I've got a bunch of plastic figures that claim to be 1:72 scale, but stand about 20mm to the top of their heads. They'd look very small next to most things sold as 20mm. * Think less a small building for putting a car in than the warehouse from the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark. |
M1Fanboy | 01 Sep 2023 9:10 a.m. PST |
My vehicles are 1/72 and my figures are 20mm. It all tends to work out. Now 1/76 is a different matter. Those vehicles stick out like a sore thumb. |
Dagwood | 03 Sep 2023 4:37 a.m. PST |
If you think 1/72nd and 1/76th vehicles don't work together, try 1/90th !! (Respectively 25.4mm, 24mm and 20mm for six foot.) |
MilEFEX3030 | 14 Feb 2024 5:50 a.m. PST |
My ESCI 1/72 troops of my youth look stupid next to my 20mm AB and Elhiem "real" wargaming figures. They can't mix, not just because the plastics have slim realistic proportions but also their weapons look slimmer, differen't bodies are a thing, but different sized weapons of the same type definitely are not. I am doing alternate Vietnam in 1/72 plastics. But no metals will be attending.. |
MilEFEX3030 | 14 Feb 2024 6:04 a.m. PST |
Some Elhiem 20mm with 1/72 repainted die cast toys/kits
Elhiem 20mm less convincingly assault a 1/76 reissue of Fujimis "Secret Strong Point" playset (check the tiny doors):
|
Old Contemptible ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 14 Feb 2024 4:06 p.m. PST |
etotheipi, It's not just weapons it's all the gear they carry, backpacks, slouch bags, cartridge boxes, etc. Yes, I too mix 1:72 and 20mm. |