Help support TMP


"Myths and Realities of the Revolutionary War" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Ruleset

Die Fighting


Rating: gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.


Featured Book Review


756 hits since 24 Aug 2023
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP24 Aug 2023 8:51 p.m. PST

"The myth: The American Revolution was all about taxation…"


Main page


link

Armand

doc mcb25 Aug 2023 9:59 a.m. PST

Sigh. Yes, it is of course true that the Continental Army aspired to be, and eventually was, a conventional European style regular force comparable to the British and French and Spanish etc forces. Steuben etc etc.

But otoh, there is little that is "conventional" and much that is "guerilla-like" in the Trenton-Princeton campaign.

The danger with "myth-breaking" is to over-correct. Myths generally have SOME basis in fact.

42flanker25 Aug 2023 10:11 a.m. PST

Although, otoh, neither Trenton nor Princeton were won because the Crown forces foolishly fought standing shoulder to shoulder in line.

doc mcb25 Aug 2023 3:31 p.m. PST

42, well, the Hessians tried to, didn't they? And Princeton was a fuzzball, but bayonet charges were part of it.

42flanker25 Aug 2023 11:40 p.m. PST

That's not what I was suggesting. Clearly that occurred. It wasn't why the Crown forces were defeated.

14Bore26 Aug 2023 12:16 p.m. PST

Quartering troops in houses didn't happen yet the Colonials worried about it enough to write down the restrictions?
Europeans got it but the British decided to stop that practice?

doc mcb26 Aug 2023 1:10 p.m. PST

Britain lost for many reasons, and the revolution succeeded for many reasons. Complex events have complex causes. (Unless, of course we are speaking of the American civil war, which we all know had only ONE cause.)

And I am dubious that quartering never happened.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP26 Aug 2023 3:37 p.m. PST

Thanks


Armand

Bill N26 Aug 2023 7:32 p.m. PST

As I recall Doc there were efforts during the F&IW to forcibly quarter British troops in residences of the Colonists. Both Braddock and Loudoun claimed they had the authority to do so. Also I seem to recall that laws in Britain that limited the quartering of troops exempted the colonies, and the British government had vetoed colonial legislation which attempted to limit quartering.

doc mcb27 Aug 2023 9:28 a.m. PST

Bill, yes, the Amendment didn't come out of nowhere.

randolph224319 Sep 2023 7:08 p.m. PST

If I am correct, the colonists were required to build garrisons for the British troops protecting them, but failed to do so, which led to the whole quartering fiasco. They wanted Regulars as protection, but wouldn't fork out the money to help support the army.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.