"How best to represent an Austrian Mass?" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Empire Message Board
Action Log
27 Jul 2023 7:09 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill
- Changed title from "How best to represent a Austrian Mass ?" to "How best to represent an Austrian Mass?"
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Rosenberg | 27 Jul 2023 5:35 a.m. PST |
I see from rules you can have a frontage of single or double company's with two, three, four or six figs in the front line.
Which one of these best represents divisional and/or battalion mass? Or could any of the above be used but simply reverse the rear stand(s) as other nations do with closed column?
Thanks |
| Valmy92 | 28 Jul 2023 3:59 a.m. PST |
Exactly. Two stands wide is divisionmasse, one wide is battalionmasse |
| grenadier corporal | 28 Jul 2023 5:32 a.m. PST |
Sorry to contradict.
Divisionsmasse was not a battalion with a front of a division (ie two companies), but a division with a half-company front, so three Divisionsmassen to the battalion.
Although the Bataillonsmasse had a front of one company, I tend to represent them with a two-companies-front – not correct, but visually more pleasing. There are six stands of 4 figures abreast for my Austrian Bataillon. |
14Bore  | 30 Jul 2023 9:25 a.m. PST |
On 4th podcast. Good stuff |
|
returns to Flintloque to paint an Ogre.
