"Fight in the Jungle" Topic
1 Post
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Battle Reports Message Board Back to the WWII in the Pacific Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea
World War Two in the Air
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Can a WWII blockgame find happiness as a miniatures campaign system?
Featured Profile Article The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01  | 28 May 2023 8:42 p.m. PST |
"As much as I am a fan of the Rapid Fire game rule, I have to admit that Battlegroup Kursk is also a really good rule to use. And since a good number of my friends swear by it, I'm happy to play with them based on it. However, the devil is in the details, because this rule already comes with very "exploited" army lists, and more and more books are published about them according to battlefields. All this is good, but it has one flaw that has not yet been cured: there is no book for the Far East battlefield, no Japanese army list yet! However, my favorites are the Japanese, who could be led against China (there is also no army list), the Soviet Union, the USA or the British, or even the Dutch. While there are scenario descriptions for Rapid Fire from which you can even create a Japanese army list, unfortunately I had to do it myself for Battlegroup…" UT
Full Battle here
wargame.hu/dzsungelharc
Armand
|
|
