Help support TMP


"The Grisly Folk" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Prehistoric Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Legio VI Julia Augusta


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Eureka Amazon Project: Nude Phalangites

More figures for the 28mm Amazon army!


Featured Workbench Article

Painting a 15mm Tibetan DBA Army: The Infantry

wodger Fezian begins his series on how to paint a 15mm DBA army well, in a reasonable time frame.


Featured Profile Article

GameCon '98

The Editor tries out this first-year gaming convention in the San Francisco Bay Area (California).


874 hits since 14 May 2023
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

rvandusen Supporting Member of TMP14 May 2023 10:36 a.m. PST

The Grisly Folk is a 1921 speculative essay by H.G. Wells that concerns the migration to the Northern Hemisphere by modern humans that ends with the extinction of the Neanderthals. The work is available free online. It is interesting due to Wells' portrayal of the Neanderthals as cannibalistic subhuman hairy monsters that resist human encroachment before being overcome by the more evolved invaders. It is compelling to me that while Neanderthal cannibalism has been confirmed by various butchered remains, their image as shambling hairy orcs has been entirely discarded by several sets of remains since the first discovery of the remains of an arthritic old Neanderthal.

SBminisguy14 May 2023 11:51 a.m. PST

Well, given that most non-African descent peoples have between 2% (Asia) to 9% (some European peoples) Neanderthal DNA, wouldn't it be more accurate to say that Neanderthal were more like a distinct race and culture rather than a different human species? If they were a different species, they wouldn't have bred across multiple generations -- they would have been sterile.

So HG Wells was following a bit of a supremacist line of common thinking when looking at Anthropology and history, declaring the superiority of white European mankind. Then it flipped sometime in the 1960s, and Neanderthal were recast as happy nature hippies who were slaughtered by evil white European man.

The reality is more mixed -- you probably couldn't tell a Neanderthal from someone on the streets of a major Western city today. It was more likely a long term interaction, both friendly, indifferent and hostile. Tribes competing, cooperating, marrying into each other, fighting each other until distinct Neanderthal peoples were completely intermingled. Not a steel cage death match.

rvandusen Supporting Member of TMP14 May 2023 2:49 p.m. PST

Just following conventional biology, neanderthals are classified as a separate species under the genus Homo. Domestic dogs and wolves are also classed as distinct species and hybridize with some frequency if mingling is possible. I recall that neanderthals have skeletal differences that are measurable – pelvis, brain case, inner ear bones.

rvandusen Supporting Member of TMP14 May 2023 2:58 p.m. PST

Wells also does not describe the H. sapiens sapiens as fair hair/eyes, but as "brownish, brown-eyed, with wavy brown hair." Sounds reasonable.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP24 May 2024 4:10 p.m. PST

Thousands of cave bear bones found at Paleolithic site


picture


link


Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.