/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory [TMP] "1806-1807 - Tsar Alexander's Second War with Napoleon:" Topic

 Help support TMP


"1806-1807 - Tsar Alexander's Second War with Napoleon:" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Featured Workbench Article

Napoleonic Dragoons from Perry Miniatures

Warcolours Painting Studio Fezian paints "the best plastic sculpts I have seen so far..."


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Minairons' 1:600 Xebec

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at a fast-assembly naval kit for the Age of Sail.


907 hits since 13 May 2023
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP13 May 2023 8:45 p.m. PST

… The Russian Official History

"The Russian official history of the second war between Emperor Alexander and Napoleon, in 1806 and 1807, using original military and diplomatic documents and the testimonies of witnesses and participants from the war.


First published in 1846, the history considers the reasons for the war undertaken by Emperor Alexander in alliance with Prussia, the disaster that befell Prussia at Jena and Auerstedt, and Alexander's mobilization when, after the destruction of the Prussians, Napoleon moved to the borders of Russia…"


picture


Main page


link


Armand

Brechtel19814 May 2023 10:25 a.m. PST

Since the Russians have not been noted for accuracy, I wonder how this book is. If they include Bennigsen's after action reports as well as Wittgenstein's it will be interesting to judge whose is the most 'accurate.'

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP14 May 2023 11:24 a.m. PST

I have the 1805 book at the top of my reading pile.

It's a slim volume. From the intro, it does indeed omit many archival sources, does have some minor errors of the which unit was in was under who sort. the Tsar had final editorial control over publication, so no criticisms of that great crusading hero. So, not a flawless history, but still quite worthwhile for perspectives not found elsewhere.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP14 May 2023 3:28 p.m. PST

Thanks.

Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.