Help support TMP


"1806-1807 - Tsar Alexander's Second War with Napoleon:" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Song of Drums and Shakos


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Profile Article

Herod's Gate

Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.


650 hits since 13 May 2023
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0113 May 2023 8:45 p.m. PST

… The Russian Official History

"The Russian official history of the second war between Emperor Alexander and Napoleon, in 1806 and 1807, using original military and diplomatic documents and the testimonies of witnesses and participants from the war.


First published in 1846, the history considers the reasons for the war undertaken by Emperor Alexander in alliance with Prussia, the disaster that befell Prussia at Jena and Auerstedt, and Alexander's mobilization when, after the destruction of the Prussians, Napoleon moved to the borders of Russia…"


picture


Main page


link


Armand

Brechtel19814 May 2023 10:25 a.m. PST

Since the Russians have not been noted for accuracy, I wonder how this book is. If they include Bennigsen's after action reports as well as Wittgenstein's it will be interesting to judge whose is the most 'accurate.'

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP14 May 2023 11:24 a.m. PST

I have the 1805 book at the top of my reading pile.

It's a slim volume. From the intro, it does indeed omit many archival sources, does have some minor errors of the which unit was in was under who sort. the Tsar had final editorial control over publication, so no criticisms of that great crusading hero. So, not a flawless history, but still quite worthwhile for perspectives not found elsewhere.

Tango0114 May 2023 3:28 p.m. PST

Thanks.

Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.