Help support TMP


"Napoleonic Warfare: The Operational Art of the..." Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

One-Hour Skirmish Wargames


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Workbench Article

Painting 1:700 Black Seas French Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints his first three ships from the starter set.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


Featured Book Review


757 hits since 8 May 2023
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0108 May 2023 8:40 p.m. PST

… Great Campaigns


Of Possible interest?


Free to read


PDF link


Armand

arthur181509 May 2023 2:11 a.m. PST

Thanks, Armand!

rustymusket09 May 2023 6:06 a.m. PST

Thanks, Armand!

Brechtel19809 May 2023 2:41 p.m. PST

The author does use some suspect sources in his essay including Jomini's various 'histories', Nosworthy's With Musket, Cannon and Sword…, Marshal Macdonald's Recollections, Weigley's The Age of Battles, Britt's Wars of Napoleon, this last being a replacement text in History of the Military Art at West Point, the text it replaced being much superior to this one.

Further, Chandler's Campaigns of Napoleon is overused and Owen Connelly's Blundering to Glory is not helpful, nor is Esdaile's Napoleon's Wars.

Tango0109 May 2023 3:28 p.m. PST

A votre service mes amis…

Armand

Valmy9209 May 2023 5:03 p.m. PST

I read it when it was new and thought it was quite interesting at the time. Are the sources suspect? Depends on what you're using them for.
Is everything that uses "suspect" sources useless? Not really IIRC it's more a synthesis of secondary sources rather than primary research.

Brechtel19810 May 2023 2:35 p.m. PST

If a book, et al, has inaccurate or incorrect information, then its value lessens considerably. That makes the book or other source suspect and it shouldn't be used as a source.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.