"Mongol Warrior v European Knight Review" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Media Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench ArticleAdam loves Scorched Brown...
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01 | 25 Apr 2023 8:58 p.m. PST |
" This is the latest in Osprey's 'Combat' series by Stephen Turnbull. I have been sceptical about this and similar series because some of the match-ups are a bit tenuous, and they don't offer much that hasn't been covered in other series by the same publisher. However, this is an interesting match-up, pitting two very different warriors against each other. Of course, the Mongols were not the first horse archers the European Knight had faced. Nevertheless, most western European knights had little experience with this warfare. The Mongols were also much more than just another Steppe horse archer. They had heavy cavalry, brought their knowledge of siege warfare from China, and the sheer numbers and tactical awareness made them a feared enemy…" Full Review here
link
Armand
|
Legionarius | 27 Apr 2023 6:15 p.m. PST |
The comparison is a stretch. Mongol cavalry would not normally engage a western knight in one on one combat. The Mongols would use their greater agility and pester a group of knight with arrows and tire them and their horses. They would kill unprotected horses leaving knights stranded and vulnerable. The fight was between the well-organized Mongol units against the individualistic knights. In open terrain, the Mongols would win every time. In closed terrain their tactics did not work very well. That is why they stopped at the Hungarian plain. |
Tango01 | 28 Apr 2023 3:24 p.m. PST |
|
|