Happy Wanderer | 13 Apr 2023 6:46 a.m. PST |
Gents, Can anyone recall any historical encounters between one pre-dreadnought vs another? Or perhaps between 3-4 ships? I for the life of me can't put my finger on any…anyone know of any? Kind regards Happy W |
IronDuke596 ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 13 Apr 2023 9:32 a.m. PST |
Battle of Tsushima, 1905. |
BillyNM | 13 Apr 2023 10:28 a.m. PST |
Try the Greeks vs the Turks in the First Balkan War. |
enfant perdus ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 13 Apr 2023 10:57 a.m. PST |
First Balkan War was my thought too, but I think the small actions were limited to catching the enemy ship at anchor and torpedoing or shelling them. Since this is crossposted to Ironclads, there are a number of relevant actions in that timeframe. Heligoland, Iquique, Angamos, Comet vs. Boulet at Havana,spring to mind. |
Virtualscratchbuilder ![Workbencher Fezian](boards/icons/workbencher.gif) | 13 Apr 2023 11:49 a.m. PST |
Yellow Sea is as small as it gets… 6 vs 4. There were a couple predread vs dread skirmishes in WWI, but that is about it. |
phssthpok | 13 Apr 2023 12:28 p.m. PST |
Possible South American what ifs? |
JMcCarroll | 13 Apr 2023 1:03 p.m. PST |
Spanish-American war. Plenty of actions but as you say fleets at anchor really don't count. |
ColCampbell ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 13 Apr 2023 2:09 p.m. PST |
Tsushima doesn't really fit the Happy Wanderer's criteria of a "small" action. Jim |
Happy Wanderer | 13 Apr 2023 2:55 p.m. PST |
Thanks gents I couldn't find info on Comet vs Boulet..any idea where I'd find an account of that? The big actions are out…I'm looking ideally for 1 vs 1. This looks good link Cheers
Happy W |
TMPWargamerabbit | 13 Apr 2023 6:14 p.m. PST |
Trouble is the dreadnoughts, or pre-dreadnoughts, always come with their fleet of smaller ships…cruisers, destroyers or torpedo boats. Russo-Japanese war is the best I come up as mentioned. |
Tgerritsen ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 13 Apr 2023 6:33 p.m. PST |
Yalu River in Sino Japanese War comes to mind, but was fairly large. Here's a list to reference various naval battles. link |
Tgerritsen ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 13 Apr 2023 6:34 p.m. PST |
Lots and lots of hypothetical battles, though. |
Martin Rapier | 14 Apr 2023 1:25 a.m. PST |
In the RJW the pre dreads were accompanied by swarms of cruisers and destroyers. None of the battles can be described as 'small' although I've fought most of them. I'm not sure any navy in its right mind would send out a single battleship without any escorts, however much wargamers might want them to. |
Virtualscratchbuilder ![Workbencher Fezian](boards/icons/workbencher.gif) | 14 Apr 2023 4:21 a.m. PST |
A long time ago there was a pocket game called "Fire When Ready" that had a neat scenario. If I remember right it was 4 Royal Sovereigns and a couple big cruisers against the 5 ugly sisters and a couple small early armored cruisers. Never played it though. Scenario was called "the Fashoda Affair". |
Happy Wanderer | 14 Apr 2023 5:36 a.m. PST |
Thanks for your additional insightful comments chaps…most welcome. I was reading the Admiralty trilogy supplement for the Russo Japanese war and in it there is 2 1/2 pages on Japanese naval Tactics described by Admiral Togo. One point that certainly stood out was that the Japanese would concentrate all the fire on one Russian ship to reduce it as quickly as possible before moving onto the next. This would seem to fly in the face of the notion of visually spotting gun shots and making corrections and not confusion different ships shooting at the same target. The Japanese seem to be able to concentrate their guns on a single target though no doubt many other Russia ships were engaged as well as the Tsushima post battle tally showed. On a similar topic what would be the doctrine of the Royal Navy and European navies this time regarding fleet battle of tactics? With the Europeans in the ‘fire all at one ship' school or more geared towards each ship duking it out in the battle line? And what of the Americans? What was their doctrine at this time when it came to engaging enemy battle fleets? Any information on these matters would be most welcome and if you could point me in the direction of some good reading on this topic that would also be welcome.
Thank you |
David Taylor | 14 Apr 2023 12:13 p.m. PST |
The Battle of Agamos Point, 8 October 1879, between the Peruvian turret ship Husacar and the Chilean centre-battery ironclads Almirante Cochrane and Blanco Encalada. |
Blutarski | 14 Apr 2023 3:58 p.m. PST |
BillyNM wrote -
Try the Greeks vs the Turks in the First Balkan War. Billy is spot on. Battle of Elli – 1912 Battle of Lemnos – 1913 Both battles should fit the criteria very nicely. B |
Blutarski | 14 Apr 2023 4:06 p.m. PST |
BTW , recommend following book: IRONCLADS IN ACTION by H W Wilson B
|
NCC1717 | 14 Apr 2023 4:33 p.m. PST |
IRONCLADS IN ACTION by H W Wilson was later revised and expanded as BATTLESHIPS IN ACTION. Both are two volume sets. Prices vary quite a bit for the many printings. Example: link |
DBS303 | 20 Apr 2023 8:36 p.m. PST |
Not quite what you asked, but of course there are the Black Sea actions in WW1 when Goeben/Yavuz, a single dreadnought battlecruiser, fought engagements with Russian pre-dreadnoughts, and in 1918 nearly fought with the British pre-dreadnoughts off Gallipoli having sunk two monitors, but was forced to retire damaged after hitting mines that also sank Breslau/Midilli before HMS Agamemnon could close with her. |
Blutarski | 21 Apr 2023 7:03 a.m. PST |
"… Goeben/Yavuz, a single dreadnought battlecruiser, fought engagements with Russian pre-dreadnoughts," Battle of Cape Sarych Interesting engagement, very ticklish for Admiral Souchon. Great summary here – gwpda.org/naval/csayrch1.htm |