"FBI Finds Trove Of Missing Historic Guns" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Firearms Message Board
Areas of InterestRenaissance
18th Century
Napoleonic
American Civil War
19th Century
World War One
World War Two on the Land
Modern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article Paul Glasser almost missed out on his most-enjoyable game at Gen Con 2008.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
35thOVI   | 30 Mar 2023 6:20 a.m. PST |
Subject: FBI Finds Trove Of Missing Historic Guns
link |
| Frederick | 30 Mar 2023 7:04 a.m. PST |
Good day for the FBI and the good people of Pennsylvania law enforcement |
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 30 Mar 2023 7:12 a.m. PST |
So his story is that he wasn't the one who stole them? |
| 79thPA | 30 Mar 2023 7:22 a.m. PST |
|
 Parzival | 30 Mar 2023 7:45 a.m. PST |
No, he stole them. He just didn't intend to sell them… until, apparently, he did sell at least one of them. The first story isn't clear on how he "led" the investigators to the other guns. Interestingly, the guns in his home were apparently legal purchases, but they were somehow able to connect him with the stolen guns, and in a plea deal, he indicated where the stolen guns could be found. (I think.) Honestly, the first article is confusingly written. I can't get any sense of how many actual stolen guns were recovered (as opposed to his otherwise legal collection), or if all the guns stolen by the man have been recovered, or if all the guns stolen at the time have been recovered (that is, were others coincidentally stealing museum firearms at the time?) I think it's an "all were stolen by him and all have been recovered" story, but it's a little unclear on what "all" means, and if the "trove" includes the legal guns too. The second article only mentions one gun, and not the gun most prominently mentioned in the first article. |
| 35thOVI | 30 Mar 2023 7:52 a.m. PST |
I only put it out because of the rare pistol.😂 |
| Dn Jackson | 01 Apr 2023 2:51 p.m. PST |
"The defense attorney told reporters his client simply collected the guns because he loved history, memorized every detail about them and had no intention of ever selling them." Apparently, that does NOT make it okay. |
|
