
"BOUDICCA vs PAULINUS" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Solo Wargamers Message Board Back to the Ancients Battle Reports Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral Ancients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article How does coverbinding work?
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
|
JPChris56  | 12 Mar 2023 3:38 a.m. PST |
Gentlemen, The TRIUMPH! / GRAND TRIUMPH! rules were used for these 3 scenarios/refights of The Battle of Watling Street. An invitation is extended to those with the interest and time. Here is the link: link Cheers, Chris
|
79thPA  | 13 Mar 2023 11:47 a.m. PST |
You mention the difficulty of barbarians vs. the blades in a frontal assault… While it certainly makes sense to go for the flank if you are already set up on the flank, I wonder how many barbarian commanders could convince their hordes to ponder finesse and flank marches as opposed to charging straight at the enemy. |
JPChris56  | 14 Mar 2023 4:59 a.m. PST |
79thPA – Thanks for taking the time to read and thanks for offering a comment or two. True enough, it would probably be difficult to convince a warband or even a larger group of face-the-enemy-head-on types to adopt more sophisticated tactics. The terrain was a factor, at least as reported in the source material consulted. If we go with a simple wargame approach, then perhaps the barbarian player-general will want to try getting his warriors on that flank or those flanks. Regarding the history of this uprising, I understand that the Britons were able to plan ahead and execute at least one large ambush. Having a Roman force located in one position seems to offer another chance at an ambush or at least something less costly than a full-on frontal assault. Anyway . . . Thanks again for taking the time. Cheers, Chris |
|