
"The Sinking of the USS Housatonic was a Turning Point" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ironclads (1862-1889) Message Board
Areas of InterestAmerican Civil War 19th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article Using Projects in Grok to create stories.
Featured Book Review
|
| Tango01 | 25 Oct 2022 9:36 p.m. PST |
…in Naval Warfare "The first missions for the Housatonic were rousing successes. In January 1863, she took part in the capture of the USS Princess Royal, a British blockade runner loaded with supplies for the Confederate Army. The imports, which consisted of ammunition and ordnance, were later called "the war's most important single cargo of contraband."…"
Main page
link
Armand
|
| Murvihill | 26 Oct 2022 6:14 a.m. PST |
If you are winning the '1st ship sunk by sub' question in a history trivia game you would be right, but calling a sub that killed two crews to perform a single op a turning point seems a little optimistic. |
| 42flanker | 26 Oct 2022 11:52 a.m. PST |
I think it's possible that the steamship and blockade runner Princess Royal didn't become USS Princess Royal until after she was captured by the US Navy in January 1863. |
| Tango01 | 26 Oct 2022 4:25 p.m. PST |
|
| Pyrate Captain | 11 Apr 2023 5:48 p.m. PST |
Hi Murvihill, The same argument has been presented in regard to the Kriegsmarine's K-verband. Until the advent of the Seehund, the losses appeared in the high percentile. But in terms of raw numbers, were minuscule to the losses inflicted on the enemy. It's true that both Housatonic and Hunley lost a comparable number of men in the engagement. But the US Navy lost a steam sloop and in exchange for what the US Navy would have considered a boiler. Unfortunately for the CSN, the shortage of iron made Hunley a near strategic loss. Still, no matter how it is analyzed, the attack caused a change in Union naval tactics and revolutionized naval warfare. In keeping with the realm of submarine loss to victory, the US Navy lost approximately 1 fleet submarine for every month of the US's involvement in WWII, but accounted for a disproportionately high loss rate in the Japanese merchant marine and Nihon Kaigun in exchange for a relatively small loss. The peacetime losses of submarines up to contemporary times demonstrates the near infancy of undersea warfare. Squalus, although raised, the Thresher, the Scorpion, and the soviet losses just prove it doesn't take a naval engagement to lose a submersible torpedo boat. Yet, like losses in space, we humans progress. |
| Murvihill | 13 Apr 2023 2:30 p.m. PST |
The next time a ship was sunk by a submarine was 1914, or 50 years later. Hunley presaged the advent of the submarine, but didn't herald it. |
|