Help support TMP


"Russian Columns" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Empire Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Captain Boel Umfrage

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian returns to Flintloque to paint an Ogre.


Current Poll


1,225 hits since 1 Sep 2022
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Rosenberg01 Sep 2022 10:59 a.m. PST

In Osprey's Men at Arts Series 185 Russian Infantry Pg 12-13 it states that after Borodino with immediate effect a change to a longer and thinner formation was adopted. There is no mention in the Empire V or R&E rules. Can anyone suggest how this new formation might be shown on the wargames table or are French columns always to have a partial enfilade?

Rosenberg01 Sep 2022 11:53 a.m. PST

Men at Arms

BillyNM Supporting Member of TMP01 Sep 2022 1:01 p.m. PST

It's not clear from the text in the Osprey (MAA 185) whether new formations were employed or whether wider / thinner tactical formations that already existed were more widely employed than before.

Glengarry501 Sep 2022 7:09 p.m. PST

Perhaps this refers to attack (or assault) columns which were, roughly, twice the width (and thus half the depth) of a column of manoeuvre. Similar to the Austrian "mass", which was 2 companies wide and 6 companies deep. More maneuverable and solid than an infantry line.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.