Help support TMP


"Russian Columns" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Empire Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

March Attack


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Soldaten Hulmutt Jucken

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints the Dogman from the Flintloque starter set.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Black Seas

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian explores the Master & Commander starter set for Black Seas.


Featured Book Review


1,349 hits since 31 Aug 2022
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Rosenberg01 Sep 2022 9:59 a.m. PST

In Osprey's Men at Arts Series 185 Russian Infantry Pg 12-13 it states that after Borodino with immediate effect a change to a longer and thinner formation was adopted. There is no mention in the Empire V or R&E rules. Can anyone suggest how this new formation might be shown on the wargames table or are French columns always to have a partial enfilade?

Rosenberg01 Sep 2022 10:53 a.m. PST

Men at Arms

BillyNM01 Sep 2022 12:01 p.m. PST

It's not clear from the text in the Osprey (MAA 185) whether new formations were employed or whether wider / thinner tactical formations that already existed were more widely employed than before.

Glengarry501 Sep 2022 6:09 p.m. PST

Perhaps this refers to attack (or assault) columns which were, roughly, twice the width (and thus half the depth) of a column of manoeuvre. Similar to the Austrian "mass", which was 2 companies wide and 6 companies deep. More maneuverable and solid than an infantry line.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.