
"The versatile British PIAT" Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Flames of War Message Board Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board Back to the Bolt Action Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War One World War Two on the Land Modern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article Finally, a game that's not so flat.
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
Warspite1 | 03 Aug 2022 4:00 a.m. PST |
Myth-busting the PIAT with Military History Visualised: YouTube link A wall-buster in street fighting, in-direct firing in Italy and a good anti-tank weapon etc. Barry |
ColCampbell  | 03 Aug 2022 6:31 a.m. PST |
Very interesting explanation of the PIAT. Thanks, Jim |
Stoppage | 03 Aug 2022 5:44 p.m. PST |
So it seems you could actually drop these into a trench at a rate of upto five-rounds-per-minute. PIAT bomb 2.6 lbs or 3 lbs (350 yards / 320 m) 2 inch mortar bomb 2.25 lbs (500 yards / 460 m) 3 inch mortar bomb 10 lbs (2,800 yards / 1,500 m) |
Mark 1  | 03 Aug 2022 8:48 p.m. PST |
> at a rate of upto five-rounds-per-minute. But bear in mind the size difference for the rounds, and the crew / portage differences in the doctrine. That is, a PIAT typically had a 2 man crew, and was man-ported. The 4-inch bomb was substantially larger than a 2 inch mortar bomb (the other man-ported weapon on the list). The 3-inch mortar was served by a full squad-sized crew, and was not expected to be carried around the battlefield tactically, so was more often able to stockpile ammunition. The net result is that a PIAT might go into action with 3 or maybe 6 rounds of ammunition with the weapon. If it was firing from a pre-sighted position (a defensive firing position, for example) it might have a few more. But it was, I expect, quite unlikely to be any number of rounds that would make 5 rounds per minute a useful metric. Except perhaps for a sort of mad-minute barrage. I could see a single burst of 4 or 5 rounds dropped quickly being a useful for short-term suppression, either in support of a final rush onto an objective or to break up a rush onto a defended position. Did the PIAT have a general-purpose HE projectile, or a shrapnel projectile, to support such use? A HEAT projectile pointing steeply down into the ground is probably not the most effective casualty-generator. -Mark (aka: Mk 1) |
Oberlindes Sol LIC  | 03 Aug 2022 9:39 p.m. PST |
thanks. That was a good video. |
Warspite1 | 04 Aug 2022 3:31 p.m. PST |
Thank you all. I should add that there is a recorded use of a PIAT at Arnhem in 1944. A German tank was located on the far side of a building and out of sight to the weapon shooting. A spotter located to the side could see the fall-of-shot. The first PIAT round was an over, the second was a short and the third was bang-on. Not mentioned in the video is that the weapon gained a bad rep for premature detonations due to the over sensitivity of its lead azide fuses. So much so that it was declared a dangerous weapon post-war and training was banned, hence the switch to the 3.5-inch Super Bazooka in Korea. Barry |
Midlander65 | 05 Aug 2022 12:27 p.m. PST |
A good video and well worth watching. I've lost count of the number of times I've heard the PIAT described as spring powered so top marks for putting that one straight! A couple of minor gripes – not connected to the PIAT but to how it was deployed and British infantry organisation: around 50 men in a platoon in two sections – don't think so. Also, from what I've read (very happy to be corrected on this if I have misunderstood) officially, 3 PIATs were allocated per (normal infantry) company – I don't doubt that they were invariably handed out as one per platoon but that was a local choice. |
Die Engelsman | 26 Sep 2022 4:30 a.m. PST |
The official ToE might have been 3 PIATs per company, but I suspect the real number depended on how many the troops wanted, how many they were prepared to lug around and how many they could acquire. |
Trockledockle | 18 Nov 2022 1:39 p.m. PST |
I think that there is a Canadian report stating that they considered the PIAT to be the most useful infantry weapon they had – better than the Bren! Regarding Die Engelsman's comment, in October 1944, the 2nd Argylls were short of men so formed a 43 man battle group organization which had 2 PIATs, 7 Brens, 2 mortars and a "sprinkling" of rifles. |
4th Cuirassier  | 29 Nov 2022 1:39 a.m. PST |
I love that the Australians called this the Projector, Infantry, Tank Attack: "PITA". |
|