Help support TMP


"Movement through unlimbered artillery" Topic


13 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Empire Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Soldaten Hulmutt Jucken

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints the Dogman from the Flintloque starter set.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Streets & Sidewalks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at some new terrain products, which use space age technology!


Featured Book Review


905 hits since 15 Jul 2022
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Rosenberg15 Jul 2022 3:43 a.m. PST

With all the impedimenta of the battery behind the gun line was it practical for an infantry or indeed cavalry unit to move through the battery? Empire allows Cavalry to charge and not be disordered if they start their movement 2" or less behind the battery. Can this be logical/historically accurate?

Personal logo 20thmaine Supporting Member of TMP15 Jul 2022 4:26 a.m. PST

It doesn't sound right. I'm thinking of big reenactment shows I've seen and the idea of cavalry charging undisordered through a battery that lacks all the cassions and battery horses seems like a fantasy.

Is there an historical precedent that I can't think of?

Eumelus Supporting Member of TMP15 Jul 2022 6:03 a.m. PST

Certainly it would be unlikely that cavalry on a broad front could or would gallop through all of that impedimenta. But virtually all of a "charge", except the final few hundred paces, was made at the walk or trot. The attacking regiments could weave their way through gaps in batteries or sections, maneuvering by fours or by troops/companies, until they cleared the battery. Then, reforming by squadron/regiment, they could continue their attack.

Considering how much of a Napoleonic corps front was typically covered by engaged batteries, I would expect that more cavalry charges than not had to pass through their own batteries before executing their attack.

I'm not familiar with "Empire", but if I were writing the rules I would say something along the line that as long as the cavalry has half of its movement allowance (including any "charge" bonus) left after clearing its own battery, the charge could proceed.

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP15 Jul 2022 11:33 a.m. PST

Republic to Empire disallows movement through the rear area of batteries for reasons just as you noted….

14Bore15 Jul 2022 12:13 p.m. PST

I play Empire III don't allow movement through a battery or any other units. Find many other rules played at convention seem to allow all kinds of movement through units.

HMS Exeter15 Jul 2022 2:37 p.m. PST

IIRC, Empire II allowed cavalry to move through unlimbered arty at a walk. If it wanted to charge, it needed to clear the arty first. The distance it could charge was proportionally reduced based on the percentage of its' walk speed distance used to clear the obstacle.

IIRC.

Mike Petro15 Jul 2022 3:07 p.m. PST

A trained unit "should" be able to move through a battery in a disorderly fashion, form back up in line, and charge home. I fail to see how it would be unrealistic for a professional unit.

Personal logo 20thmaine Supporting Member of TMP15 Jul 2022 3:45 p.m. PST

But should they then at least suffer a movement distance penalty compared to a cavalry unit charging in the open?

I can't help thinking that falling out of order, moving in small files or as individuals and then reordering the line has got to take some time. And presumably, the guns don't get to move (or fire!).

Still trying to think of that historical example of cavalry massed behind guns and then moving through them to charge the enemy. You'd think they'd get in the way of the cannister shot…..

Dn Jackson Supporting Member of TMP15 Jul 2022 5:57 p.m. PST

When I was reenacting heavily we used to practice doing just that, albeit on foot. We actually did it for the movie Gods and Generals, but they didn't use the footage.

A unit marching in line can move to a formation with each company in a column, (can't remember the name of the maneuver), pass through the guns, and go back into a line. The whole thing done at a marching pace. with a bit of practice it didn't slow us down very much.

Rosenberg16 Jul 2022 2:16 a.m. PST

It happens on one of the best anti-war film (in my view) Gettysburg Armistead's Brigade march through the gun line. Off at a tangent Gettysburg's the only war film that's made me cry and I'm an American. Actors that played Armistead, Burford, and Longstreet were remarkable.

Rosenberg16 Jul 2022 2:17 a.m. PST

Not an American

Personal logo 20thmaine Supporting Member of TMP16 Jul 2022 10:39 a.m. PST

And I can see that with infantry it's more achievable to move through a gun line in a relatively straightforward way (although I'd probably dock them a part move for two formation changes).

Equally so with horses? Still not fully convinced.

Stoppage18 Jul 2022 12:35 p.m. PST

I am not sure that I'd be too pleased – as battery commander – of a bunch of unwashed infanteers wandering through my stores, my equipment, my gun-line.

Imagine the moaning as the gunners discover that all the buckets and tools have been stolen – not to mention their personal stashes hidden in the caissons having been rifled-through.

Walk around.

The only infantry I'd allow nearby are my Yeger protection squad.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.