Help support TMP


"The 10 Worst Continental Army Generals" Topic


13 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Fire and Steel


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Acolyte Vampires - Based

The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.


Featured Profile Article

Land of the Free: Elemental Analysis

Taking a look at elements in Land of the Free.


Featured Book Review


807 hits since 18 Jun 2022
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0118 Jun 2022 9:44 p.m. PST

"…The Continental Congress faced an almost overwhelming challenge in appointing leadership to command the new army. While my research and calculations show that fully 85% of the men ultimately appointed as general had some type of prewar military experience, either professional or militia, most was at a low level of command. This forced the Congress to commission senior leaders based more on reputation and expectations than relevant experience. Foreign generals owed their appointments mostly to international politics and claimed, but sometimes unverified, credentials. The ever present politics of command affected both initial appointments and promotions throughout the entire conflict…"


More in the Journal of American Revolution Blog

link


Armand

doc mcb19 Jun 2022 7:54 a.m. PST

Gus is correct about Wilkinson, as slimy a piece of work as they come.

doc mcb19 Jun 2022 7:56 a.m. PST

They didn't send us their best, did they?

Tango0119 Jun 2022 3:49 p.m. PST

Thanks.

Armand

Bill N20 Jun 2022 4:33 a.m. PST

If George Washington had been sacked after Fort Washington fell, Washington would have been on that list even though he had forced the British to evacuate Boston. Gates was not the military genius his supporters claimed he was in the aftermath of Saratoga. He also wasn't the bumbler his critics colored him as in the aftermath of Camden. A number of things Gates did in the southern campaign were sound, or at least made sense given the information available to him. Plus Gates wasn't the only Continental general to disappear from the battlefield at Camden when the militia bolted.

doc mcb21 Jun 2022 3:03 p.m. PST

Gus, yes, looking for work. LOL

Tango0121 Jun 2022 3:28 p.m. PST

(smile)


Armand

Personal logo Old Contemptible Supporting Member of TMP24 Jun 2022 11:54 p.m. PST

If you judge Arnold by his military accomplishments and abilities alone, he is actually in my top five best Continental Generals. He maybe in the top ten of British Generals. He certainly wasn't any worse than the other British Generals save Cornwallis. He never had much of an opportunity to demonstrate his abilities with the British. Such a tragic figure.

Bill N25 Jun 2022 1:23 p.m. PST

What about in Virginia OC?

Personal logo Old Contemptible Supporting Member of TMP25 Jun 2022 5:10 p.m. PST

His raid on Richmond was successful despite difficulties on the withdraw from Richmond. But what else did he do as a British commander?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.