
"Revisiting Sharp Practice" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Battle Reports Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article After many years of resisting the urge to start a Napoleonic collection, Monkey Hanger takes the plunge!
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
|
Tango01  | 17 Jun 2022 9:42 p.m. PST |
" I gave Sharp Practice 2 a positive review when it came out and played several games across the time period. It was certainly an improvement on the first edition. However, I have hardly played it since, and I suspect that's because the various Dan Mersey rule sets for the period have captured my attention. My midweek wargame club (Prestwick) isn't back playing yet because of problems with the venue, so when a member suggested a game at home with Sharp Practice, I dusted down my set of the rules…." link
link
link
More in Balkan Wargamer Blog link Armand |
BillyNM  | 17 Jun 2022 10:11 p.m. PST |
Lardy rules are a bit from most so I find it easy to mess up the rules if I've not played them for a while but usually worth the effort. |
redmist1122 | 17 Jun 2022 10:23 p.m. PST |
Definitely a BIG improvement from the first edition. We play them about once a month or so…fun for Peninsular and F&IW action. I like the skirmish aspect and try not play too much rank/file in the rules. Good stuff all around. If you go to the TFL SP page, look in the files section, some really good QRS for the game…will help with remembering the mechanics fast. P. |
Tango01  | 18 Jun 2022 3:13 p.m. PST |
|
|