Help support TMP

"The first known case of chemical warfare" Topic

4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board

Areas of Interest


Featured Hobby News Article

Featured Recent Link

Featured Ruleset

A Fistfull of Miniatures

Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star 

Featured Showcase Article

Sumerian Chariots in 6mm

Remember back in 2005, when I promised pictures of those Sumerian chariot stands in 6mm?

Featured Workbench Article

A Sumerian Four-Ass Chariot

Chocolate Fezian finds his bluff is called!

Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.

Featured Book Review

237 hits since 16 Jun 2022
©1994-2022 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP16 Jun 2022 8:51 p.m. PST

"Chemical warfare has been one of the most brutal, effective, and inhumane forms of warfare in history.

Chemical warfare was notorious for being used during the First World War, which killed and disfigured hundreds of thousands; but this was not the first true instance of chemical warfare in history.

The earliest known case took place around the 3rd century AD in the lands of Syria, where the Romans and the Sasanian Persians clashed over the Levant for the strategic military fortifications and rich farming that produced high yields of grain each year…."

Main page



whitejamest17 Jun 2022 6:56 a.m. PST

Chemical warfare is certainly fascinating in a brutal nightmarish way, but I don't know that I would call it one of the most effective forms of warfare in history. The use of poison gas in WWI continues to grab attention because it was so horrific, and the personal toll on those exposed was so high. But what was its real strategic impact? What would have been different if it had never been used, on the macro level? The number of casualties it caused bares no comparison to the artillery, or the effects of blockade for example.

Regicide164917 Jun 2022 11:33 a.m. PST

'Greek fire' or 'naptha' was certainly in use by Byzantium in the 7th Century AD. I have a vague recollection that it was used much earlier, but can't substantiate the suspicion. Please help, anybody.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP17 Jun 2022 3:30 p.m. PST



Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.