KeepYourPowderDry ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 02 Jun 2022 2:53 a.m. PST |
I had a thought, and well… this happened. More pictures, rationale and other nonsense link
|
John Armatys | 02 Jun 2022 3:06 a.m. PST |
That really is sadly impressive…. |
BillyNM | 02 Jun 2022 4:14 a.m. PST |
Given that's double typical depth (6-man files) it shows why strong units might sometimes form up in two battalia in the field. |
skipper John | 02 Jun 2022 5:08 a.m. PST |
Woohoo!! Amazing! Sir, I salute you! |
Timbo W | 02 Jun 2022 5:25 a.m. PST |
Nice, be interesting to see how they look 6 deep. In fact you have enough to do 2 'typical strength' regiments at 1:1. There have been proposals that 8 rank deep deployment was used by the Parliamentarians at Edgehill. Odd to think that ECW 8 ranks is a deep line, but Napoleonics 9 ranks deep is a column 🤔 |
KeepYourPowderDry ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 02 Jun 2022 6:31 a.m. PST |
Thanks all, if only my kitchen table was bigger… |
79thPA ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 02 Jun 2022 6:35 a.m. PST |
11 more regiments and you can put on a game. |
KeepYourPowderDry ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 02 Jun 2022 6:37 a.m. PST |
Would definitely need a bigger kitchen table. And movement trays the size of sofas. |
DisasterWargamer ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 02 Jun 2022 7:48 a.m. PST |
Love it – even doing a second one to look at a melee and fire between two units would be interesting |
Fred Mills | 02 Jun 2022 8:07 a.m. PST |
|
CAPTAIN BEEFHEART | 02 Jun 2022 8:12 a.m. PST |
A great way to visualize what a unit would look like. |
martin goddard ![Sponsoring Member of TMP Sponsoring Member of TMP](boards/icons/sponsor.gif) | 02 Jun 2022 8:36 a.m. PST |
Mr Pig must be a rich man now. Very nice. martin |
Frederick ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 02 Jun 2022 8:58 a.m. PST |
|
Shagnasty ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 02 Jun 2022 10:10 a.m. PST |
Thank you. I've often thought of doing this but haven't, even though my game table is a ping pong surface. |
jsmcc91 | 02 Jun 2022 10:54 a.m. PST |
|
raylev3 | 02 Jun 2022 8:54 p.m. PST |
This clearly demonstrates why in wargames wheeling is so limited or can't be done. You look at a 24-figure unit and you think it's easy to wheel, but when you see this, you can understand why you shouldn't be able to wheel so easily. It's impressive. |
Zephyr1 | 02 Jun 2022 9:17 p.m. PST |
|
KeepYourPowderDry ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 02 Jun 2022 9:55 p.m. PST |
Thanks all, glad you liked it. |
Stoppage | 03 Jun 2022 3:06 p.m. PST |
Lovely to see so many miniatures. Discussed lightly in this thread:
TMP – The footprint of the Tercio, Dutch and Swedish battalions The files may have been six feet apart (maybe siz/eight/ten/twelve ranks deep. But this would have been a forming-up and manouevring schema.
So the 1,000 person battalion at ten ranks deep would have been at least 600 feet wide. In the actual fight they might have marched the rear-half of the file alongside the front-half – thus doubling the number of files. So the 1,000 person battalion would now have the same width but be half the depth. Or could be that the shot keep the deep files and wide spacing so that a pair of files could march out front to fire; whilst the pike doubled files to receive a charge = although at six feet apart a lot of enemy shot would whiz past into thin air. * I believe that the ten companies would have been equalized and then used to form five-company battalias. (circa 300 feet or 100 yards wide) |
KeepYourPowderDry ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 05 Jun 2022 4:47 a.m. PST |
Thank you Stoppage. This exercise was always going to be slightly flawed due to kitchen table parameters. The whole thing has promoted some very interesting discussion, particularly over on Twitter. |